the actress, starr, whatever she was bette midler, she took a whack at joe manchin. can we put that up on the full screen? but joe manchin wants to move forward and not backward. he wants us all to be like the state, west virginia. poor and illiterate and strung out. now, jim jordan, let me just say west virginia has higher literacy rates then new york and west virginia is much more hospitable to business then new york. but this is the old deplorable thing. the hillary clinton deplorable thing or the obama thing as well. this is where it is today. no, they don t like us, this is the attitude of the so-called elite. they think that they are better than us regular folks. i think it makes the country
aren t sure if the reinstatement of the remain in mexico policy will help all that much at this point because the word is already out. clearly the caravans have deployed and they say that putting the genie back in the bottle can be quite difficult. dana: casey stiegel for us at the border. amazing. thanks. the constitution places its trust in the people. on hard issue after hard issue the people make this country work. abortion is a hard issue. eliminating or reducing the right to abortion will propel women backwards. two generations have now relied on this right and one out of every four women makes the decision to end a pregnancy. bill: historic arguments listening there on abortion before the court yesterday. now it s up to nine justices to reach a decision that could dramatically alter abortion rights in the u.s.
but not earlier. that s the world under roe and casey but not the constitution places its trust in the people. on hard issue after hard issue the people make this country work. abortion is a hard issue. it demands the best from all of us, not a judgment by just a few of us. when an issue affects everyone and when the constitution does not take sides on it, it belongs to the people. roe and casey have failed but the people if given the chance will succeed. this court should overrule roe and casey and uphold the state s law. i welcome the court s questions. general stewart, you focus on the right to abortion but our jurisprudence seems to focus on in casey autonomy and in roe, privacy. does it make a difference that
unborn girl s life when she just barely can survive outside the womb, but not a day earlier, when she needs just a little help. that is the world under roe and casey. that is not the world the constitution promises. the constitution places its trust in the people. on hard issue after hard issue, the people make this country work. abortion is a hard issue. it demands the best from all of us, not just a few of us. when an issue affects everyone and the constitution does not take sides on it, it belongs to the people. roe and casey have failed, but the people, if given the chance, will succeed. this court should overrule roe and casey and uphold the state s law. i welcome the court s questions. general stewart, you focus on the right to abortion, but our jurisprudence seems to focus on, in casey, autonomy, in roe,
0 say. really? yeah. they used to be more polite. i have to say, the court over the last few years has gotten a bit more sharp in their questioning. and even sometimes to each other, and making digs at each other. that s an unfortunate trend. but i think for the most part, you ll hear a respectful discussion of the issues between the advocates and the court. maybe the most important thing to think about is when the justices are asking a question, they re not necessarily wanting to hear the answer from the advocate. they re making a point to one of the other justices. and so you as the advocate have to just understand, you re guiding a conversation more than like giving a speech and saying why you re right. and that s where that listening skill is so important. can you figure out what the justice is trying to say to her or his colleagues. so it s not only the question, but also what may be behind the question, vis-a-vis another magistrate. exactly. it s 3-d chess. that s very