sue her husband to pay for her defense. my thoughts? the insanity is just crazy. it should have no place in a central trial. unfortunately will there is a tendency in our country offensive to find a jury radio we want to believe in redemption and belief that we canner that people. a trial sevens for the truth. much the two are simply inpatible. there is no objective criteria to judge insanity. no bloodiest, no cat scan. minding reasons forebehalf that s clearly legal. it should only be considered in a sentencing face after the thert is reached.
sue her husband to pay for her defense. my thoughts? the insanity is just crazy. it should have no place in a central trial. unfortunately will there is a tendency in our country offensive to find a jury radio we want to believe in redemption and belief that we canner that people. a trial sevens for the truth. much the two are simply inpatible. there is no objective criteria to judge insanity. no bloodiest, no cat scan. minding reasons forebehalf that s clearly legal. it should only be considered in a sentencing face after the thert is reached.
sue her husband to pay for her defense. my thoughts? the insanity is just crazy. it should have no place in a central trial. unfortunately will there is a tendency in our country offensive to find a jury radio we want to believe in redemption and belief that we canner that people. a trial sevens for the truth. much the two are simply inpatible. there is no objective criteria to judge insanity. no bloodiest, no cat scan. minding reasons forebehalf that s clearly legal. it should only be considered in a sentencing face after the thert is reached.