magazines, et cetera, these are necessary things that we need to go after because they re not necessary. however, they re necessary, but the question is are they going to be sufficient to really reduce the gun violence? we know that there s been a raft of legislation been put on the floor. senator gran has issued a bill stopping gun trafficking. and background checks and high capacity magazines. jonathan, we word from a read-out at the white house that the president is going to be introducing his proposal to the president on tuesday. you know, how optimistic are we that we can tackle this problem either through congressional legislation or maybe through some version of executive power, although we don t know what that would be? this is the beginning of a movement. it s not about trying to pass a bill right now that will solve all the problems that wes raised. it s about building an effective counter force to the nra and then beating them like a drum in the next election. now, they
somebody who has done extraordinary work both in the united states senate. somebody who served this country with valor in vietnam. i can tell you there would be very little republican support for his nomination. at the end of the day there willle be very few votes. praise from president obama and deep concern from senator lindsey graham over the man likely to be topped for the top job at the pentagon. the announcement expected to be made in the last couple of days. reports the president has set isled on chuck hagel. why to you think he picked him given the republican opposition and some from the left flank as well? the only thing i can think of is that he believes hagel is as a kind of a maverick would not drink the kool-aid as the white house may see it on pentagon military spending and so on. this he would be a counter force over there and not an advocate for the armed forces in the way that even leon panetta has become. the warnings that we are hearing for example about the ef
i know him. he is a patriot. somebody who has done extraordinary work both in the united states senate. somebody who served this country with valor in vietnam. i can tell you there would be very little republican support for his nomination. at the end of the day there willle be very few votes. praise from president obama and deep concern from senator lindsey graham over the man likely to be topped for the top job at the pentagon. the announcement expected to be made in the last couple of days. reports the president has set isled on chuck hagel. why to you think he picked him given the republican opposition and some from the left flank as well? the only thing i can think of is that he believes hagel is as a kind of a maverick would not drink the kool-aid as the white house may see it on pentagon military spending and so on. this he would be a counter force over there and not an advocate for the armed forces in the way that even leon panetta has become. the warnings that we are hea
he is a patriot. somebody who has done extraordinary work both in the united states senate. somebody who served this country with valor in vietnam. i can tell you there would be very little republican support for his nomination. at the end of the day there willle be very few votes. praise from president obama and deep concern from senator lindsey graham over the man likely to be topped for the top job at the pentagon. the announcement expected to be made in the last couple of days. reports the president has set isled on chuck hagel. why to you think he picked him given the republican opposition and some from the left flank as well? the only thing i can think of is that he believes hagel is as a kind of a maverick would not drink the kool-aid as the white house may see it on pentagon military spending and so on. this he would be a counter force over there and not an advocate for the armed forces in the way that even leon panetta has become. the warnings that we are hearing for exa
people who want to work, don t have the freedom to work. they are forced to join the union, forced to pay mon tote union and the unions spend the monoa political party they don t agree with that s not freedom. that s not liberty. that s not pro-choice. why wouldn t you support the right of people to choose? that s an out-of-context descringz of the problem. the problem is without unions, there is no counterforce to big business it s legalized theft give me a chance. there is no counter force to big business to people who say, let s cut the salaries and outsource your job, everybody s only about profit and it is not about making sure that employers you want the government [overlapping dialogue] it s called forced association. our founders would be in shock understanding that to get a particular job, you had to join an association that you may fundamentally disagree with, as the cost of employment. it is forced association. it is not protected by the first