6th. one, does that ring true to you? and two, why do you think that is in. the answer is i don t know. i would certainly hope they were looking all up and down the stack of january 6th long before there was public testimony, but i don t know. i can t tell from the outside. you used to have the position the best way to handle trump was vote him out. we did that. and last week issued a bulletin if you read it everybody except republicans are at risk of domestic violent extremism intersecting with violence. it didn t work in terms of eliminating the threat of radicalized people who would adhere to an ideology consistent with things trump says or tweets or truths or whatever he uses to communicate. do you think jack smith has evidence of criminality? based on the facts i can gather from watching the media it would sure seem especially the mar-a-lago case is the most serious. i didn t know anything about that obviously earlier in this
classification markings on them in donald trump s office during that court authorized search of mar-a-lago back in august. you might be familiar with this photo showing some of the classified documents that were found in a container in trump s office with markings that suggest they contained incredibly sensitive material including intelligence obtained by human sources. here why it matters that corcoran never searched trump s office, quote, corcoran s previously unrecounted account as relayed to the guardian by two people flarl with the matter suggests he was materially misled as special counsel jack smith examines whether his incomplete search ozactually retained by trump to obtain classified documents. that new reporting is where we begin today with some of our favorite reporters and friends. nancy pelosi investigative