The 2020 election controlled the house, senate and presidency of the United States. Democrats battle over the nominee, who will they choose and whats at stake for the u. S. Israel relationship. This is impact 2020. Please welcome host of aipac National Director rob. Good morning aipac and welcome to impact 2020. Tomorrow voters and 14 states, American Samoa and american broad will head to the pool for super tuesday among those holding their primaries on tuesday are two of the nations biggest prizes. California and texas. [cheering] approximately a third of all delegates are up for grabs tomorrow. This morning we have an opportunity to hear from some of americas most wellknown and respected political authorities, we will help us make sense of a rapidly changing political environment. Please welcome attorney political commentator and recovery politician. [applause] no stranger to the aipac stage, the clinton pinkin campaign str. One of the republican parties, Brad Todd Carmack and last b
We were talking backstage about the gala tonight and i reminded them i been to the gala a number of times i know there are a bunch of friends here too people ive known an awfully long time are here with us stop i want to thank you all for supporting this really important institution. Heritage is indeed schooled many generations of tapremarket believers and i was a trustee on a think tank in kansas called the Kansas Public Policy Institute we would read heritage reports all the time to try to make sure we were getting it right and trying to get it right for the state of kansas in the same way you are doing that for washington. The last time i had the privilege of speaking in front of heritage audience was in may of last year i had been the secretary of state for a number of days. I was already missing the cia it was a much quieter much less public space. We had just pulled out of the Iran Nuclear Deal i laid out 12 conditions including that iran and the Program Release to stop terrorism
More sending off or a place like this status quo or quite negative status quo for Us Russian Relations well this is a very interesting question because well number one we do not underestimate the importance of u. S. Relationship to other countries meanwhile we do think that in some areas this stance of us russian dialogue not just matters but is of crucial importance of central importance. To a broader situation series one example we have seen over the years how letting understanding and frankly speaking very different objectives which we and the us pursued there. Makes the whole situation more difficult and not easier on the other hand we see how effective and efficient our debt conflicting. Arrangement with the u. S. Particular on syria has been all along and we frankly on our part want to spread this experience to other areas like the area where nato and russia stay close to one another and the word days cohesion is needed we need to improve our understanding on the intentions so wh
Foreign policy in regards to a number of states saying it could become less aggressive after john boltons. Off from the white house would you rather agree with that assessment we know howard. Bolton was to the e. C. U. Or you know removing any constraints in any area of legally binding nature from the u. S. Particularly in the area of arms control so. Its undeniable and i think he himself would recognize that that was the case we saw it firsthand we are hopeful that whoever would be in charge of this further on. Would adopt a view that we should at least we russia and the u. S. Buy time to consider what can or should come after the demise of i. N. F. Treaty after the u. S. Departure from. The on the iran. Is said it flatly and openly that they expect changes to the better well we can look at it with positive expectations as well but we have no certainty nor guarantee and lets the u. S. For itself and lets see 1st and foremost what will happen in reality in practice because practice mat
A potential shift in u. S. Foreign policy in regards to a number of states saying it could become less aggressive after john boltons. Off from the white house would you rather agree with that assessment we know howard. Bolton was to the e. C. U. Or you know removing any constraints in any area of legally binding nature from the u. S. Particularly in the area of arms control so. Its undeniable and i think he himself would recognize that that was the case we saw it firsthand we are hopeful that whoever would be in charge of this further on. Would adopt the view that we should at least we russia and the us buy time to consider what can or should come after the demise of i. N. F. Treaty after the u. S. Departure from. The on the. Years said it flatly and openly that they expect changes to the better well we can look at it with positive expectations as well but we have no certainty no guarantee and lets the u. S. For itself and lets see 1st and foremost what will happen in reality in practi