So for operating expenses the drivers of our future expense are primarily labor, a lot of it is what we have and paying for increases in fringe benefit costs and cola adjustments, et cetera, and the other part is from adding new resources and positions that we believe are critical to meet operating efficiencies, protect our revenue and respond to who we are today. Also in prior years we had that noncash adjustment for pier 70, the reduction of that environmental liability that we dont project having into the future. So this graphic just shows the main drivers, personnel expenses in the dark blue, charges for other city departments, other expenses, professional services. So Expense Growth is projected to outpace Revenue Growth resulting in a negative net income position throughout the projected period. Atz i said, it still shows we can cover operating and almost get to renewal, but its really the grants and contributed capital line again that small line starts at 25. 8 million out to 1.
From continued enhancement in the increase in the number of passengers that are visiting San Francisco from 202,000 projected in 2013 to 261 for our projection period. Were also assuming that 6 passenger facility charge and special events and parking revenue from pier 27 which at the end of the 18, about 1. 8 million. So the cruise investment is paying off in the maritime revenue. So for operating expenses the drivers of our future expense are primarily labor, a lot of it is what we have and paying for increases in fringe benefit costs and cola adjustments, et cetera, and the other part is from adding new resources and positions that we believe are critical to meet operating efficiencies, protect our revenue and respond to who we are today. Also in prior years we had that noncash adjustment for pier 70, the reduction of that environmental liability that we dont project having into the future. So this graphic just shows the main drivers, personnel expenses in the dark blue, charges for
Maritime revenues, the real story on our projections here is that cruise is driving the lions share of the growth in maritime revenues beyond typical cpi and thats really from continued enhancement in the increase in the number of passengers that are visiting San Francisco from 202,000 projected in 2013 to 261 for our projection period. Were also assuming that 6 passenger facility charge and special events and parking revenue from pier 27 which at the end of the 18, about 1. 8 million. So the cruise investment is paying off in the maritime revenue. So for operating expenses the drivers of our future expense are primarily labor, a lot of it is what we have and paying for increases in fringe benefit costs and cola adjustments, et cetera, and the other part is from adding new resources and positions that we believe are critical to meet operating efficiencies, protect our revenue and respond to who we are today. Also in prior years we had that noncash adjustment for pier 70, the reduction
So for operating expenses the drivers of our future expense are primarily labor, a lot of it is what we have and paying for increases in fringe benefit costs and cola adjustments, et cetera, and the other part is from adding new resources and positions that we believe are critical to meet operating efficiencies, protect our revenue and respond to who we are today. Also in prior years we had that noncash adjustment for pier 70, the reduction of that environmental liability that we dont project having into the future. So this graphic just shows the main drivers, personnel expenses in the dark blue, charges for other city departments, other expenses, professional services. So Expense Growth is projected to outpace Revenue Growth resulting in a negative net income position throughout the projected period. Atz i said, it still shows we can cover operating and almost get to renewal, but its really the grants and contributed capital line again that small line starts at 25. 8 million out to 1.
Expenses of the ship repair yard and the water basin that is there, they have worked very hard to try to get us reclassified from a federal perspective to be eligible for those grant funds. In 2006 our capital plan showed that we would lose 8 piers. One of those piers was pier 38, we now have a new plan for that. One of those piers was pier 31, we now have a new plan for that, and we continue to work at these things. With but as we went along negotiating the master permits for both the cruise ship terminal and the americas cup, worked very very hard to try to direct those investments into state of good repair. Some of those investments were the removal of derelict facilities, piles in the pier 64 area, and those are really important as well but making sure that we now one of those repairs was repairs to the aprons around pier 19 which has a dual purpose of giving us exiting to be able to put more population in pier 19 and that has a direct Public Benefit for Public Access but also a re