on my phone and £115, i could have tried to defraud thousands of people. obviously, i couldn t take part in the fraud, so i didn t take him up on the offer. instead, i asked if we could supply some numbers. vio agreed to the deal. but all of the phone numbers belonged to me. sure enough, i was targeted. it was scammers pretending to offer me a phone contract. you said you needed my bank details, is that right? yeah. what details would you need? so, we will need like the sort code and the account number.
he quit. in good conscience he decided he couldn t take part in this ongoing race fraud. his resignation letter and in this way. i wish them nothing but failure in their ongoing quest for civilizational degradation. i leave you with the only verbal response befitting any attempt at antiwhite indoctrination. daniel, i understand the temptation to give a big salute to schools that are doing this but you say you needed the paycheck. as a practical matter couldn t you have just played along to get the paycheck? sure, and then i could live to recent myself having not
which may be separate articles or not or still only on that one subject. i think it s too narrow. there s also this thing that i that we ve seen in both of the impeachment votes that we ve seen, the nixon votes in the committee, judiciary committee, as far as it got before he resigned. and then the clinton votes in the senate, for example. and that is that there were some people, some republicans especially, who voted for some articles of impeachment against richard nixon or voted for one, but they didn t vote for all three. i think there was only one republican who voted for all three. and with bill clinton, there were people who voted in favor of one article and against another article. and so that s always left the impression that just strategically you might want to lay out a menu of options so that, for example, a republican could say, well, i voted against two articles of impeachment against the president, but this one i just couldn t take. that could be.
we even heard earlier the secretary of state said that it couldn t take place at the. general assembly which is taking place later this month and i we know this was very much against. john bolton had wanted he had a much more hardline and what s more aggressive sort of policy towards iran and it appeared that this just didn t fit in this different this change of direction we ll call it in a foreign policy direction and it was it was just one of many issues that it appears they disagreed over and also let s not forget it s also been reported here that there was perhaps a little bit of a personality even between the 2 that they just simply didn t see eye to eye on on a personal level as well which is as many observers say here very important within the trumpet ministrations so public that iran of course iran is not the only country that the u.s.
theory that the voters choose the people. if president trump wants to put the g-7 summit at his golf course, there s nothing you know, he s not going to get arrested for that or fined for that. if congress decides that that is a violation of the emoluments clause in the constitution, the president couldn t take payments from foreign governments, which he would if he hosted them at his resort, if congress think it s it s a violation, they could impeach him. there s nothing illegal because the president has so much leeway. you ve done so much reporting on potential emoluments violations. from all your reporting on these alleged cases, is there anything that seems most egregious to you be, the greatest violation? doral would be far and away the biggest violation. potential violation of the emoluments clause in terms of foreign money coming in and also a violation of what trump told us he was going to do at the beginning of his term. he said, look, nobody can stop