but travis was about to be released and there was no word from the lab. would the suspect be free to roam the streets yet again? with more of our story, here s keith morrison. brown brick building on the outskirts of denver is normally quiet at night and on weekends. but in mid july 2011 the colorado bureau of investigation crime lab was a beehive of activity. a team of technicians were working round the clock, comparing a dna sample of lydia tillman s attacker to that of travis forbes to see if they matched. 60 miles away in fort collins detective jaclyn shaklee couldn t sit still. i was high on adrenaline. it was a waiting game. i mean, i kept looking at my phone, hoping for the technician from cbi to call me. reporter: especially because travis forbes, who was being held in the fort collins jail, was due to be released soon. very soon.
and you don t have to convince anybody in here. like i told you, i am not my charge by no means. you have to get to know me. it is like saying judge me and i ll prove you wrong. because i am not my charge, by no means at all. well, i can see that. i can see that. but i m not everybody in here. i know. there is a lot of people hating on you, so you need to chill out, okay? okay? eat. i think mainly what it is, is people are not liking the fact that she killed her father, and she is finding it don t get me wrong, danielle, because i love you with all of my heart. she is finding it very easy to talk about. if i shot my dad ten times in the head and there is more to it that she has told me, if it is true, i couldn t sit here calmly and talk to you or anybody else. couldn t do it. but, she is i m not her. i didn t experience it. and i hope to god i never do. but that is why they re hating on her, trying to figure out how
formally complained that this judge who keeps dressing them down in front of the jury might be killing their case. and apparently the final straw for the prosecutors was late yesterday, right before they went to recess when the judge admonished them for allowing a government witness to sit in the court before he took the stand. the problem the mueller team has with that the judge never said that witnesses couldn t sit and watch from the pews that are in the back. from the benches that are in the back before they took the stand. so they filed a motion where they said this in part. the mistake here prejudiced the government by conveying to the jury that the government had acted improperly and had violated court rules or procedures. well, this morning the judge came, in hat in hand and he said this: this robe doesn t make me anything other than human. any criticism of counsel should be put aside. after that the folks at the manafort trial today shifted to bank fraud and whether or not pau
and you don t get a swarcearch warrant for a lawyer s office. i couldn t sit here andell you today what crime he is going to be charged with and that is an important part of the question of whether i think every prudent lawyer facing what cohen is facing would have to operate under the assumption that he will be indicted for a serious crime that carries a long prison term matter as much as the fact that he will be indicted. i think any lawyer has to ae an indictment based on what jeffrey has said. you don t search lawyers offices unless you re ready to indict. what he gets indicted for, who knows. the most interesting thing if he were indicted for something that related directly to president trump. there s no indication that s in the offing, but i do think any lawyer should assume who takes the case that he s representing
that message real quickly. i also think we may be jumping the gun a little bit. we re talking about will he cooperate, will he plead? hasn t even been charged with anything yet. and we don t know what kiem he s been now we do know the southern district got a search warrant. and you don t get a search warrant for a lawyer s office. i couldn t sit here and tell you today what crime he is going to be charged with and that is an important part of the question of whether he cooperates. i don t agree.รท i think every prudent lawyer facing what cohen is facing would have to operate under the assumption that he will be indicted for a serious crime that carries a long prison term. the nature of the crime doesn t matter as much as the fact that