things. we ll save that until the end. we ll see. one of the things i will allow is people are surprised we send and we sell to wa way a tremendous amount of product that goes into the various things they make. i said that s okay we ll keep selling the product. these are american companies that make product. it s very complex. highly scientific. and in some cases we re the ones that do it and the only ones that do it. the only ones with the technology. what we have done in silicon valley is incredible. nobody can compete with it. i have agreed to allow them to continue to sell that product. so american companies will continue. the companies were not happy they couldn t sell. because they had nothing to do with whatever was potentially
attributes. trump s campaign was the least partisan in recent history because from the start he aimed hits fire at both political trenches. it is fitting and we are discussing this and this point the day after having the brand name of congressman was not a good name to have. and it strikes me those folks were trying to appeal to the trump voter and couldn t sell. it s true that today s swing voter the swing voters available to republicans is an industrial rural sort of culture of work. maybe the echo of labor, maybe they are parents worked in a blue collar role. 60% of those polled in our book said they trusted trump to do the right thing more than any institution in government in america. 20% of constitutional republicans. 85% of trump voters blamed both parties for dysfunction in washington. 70% said corporations can t be
repay you. but lots of banked failed at that. recklessness wasn t a clever strategy. bankers may have thought they could sell off they re bad loans but places like bear stearns got stuck in the crash with batd loans they couldn t sell which made them insolvent. even citigroup and bank of america saved by the bailouts suffered huchblg losses that their shareholders have yet to recover. all the financial struck churg in the world couldn t change the fact making bad loans is bad business. unfortunately it took a economically devastating crash for bankers to learn that. my employer, wells fargo wasn t perfect and it got in trouble for it s home mortgage practices but it s done much better than most banks because bankers were more careful about the risks they took. wells fargo made sure the same person was responsible for schmoozing the client, doing the lone math and monitoring the loan. once you made the loan it was your problem until the borrower
blame karl rove, blame bush, there s a lots off blame to go around. quit fix it aing. that is their central argument that the new york times, wall street journal and cnbc news already blew out of the water. and your article in politico talks about this is either a seminal moment to either try to salvage the brand or lose it forever. this negative campaigning for the democrats will not work. you said, talk about defending what you ve done. how about saying give me a democratic congress back and here s what i will do affirmatively. all he says is don t give mae republican congress bus we don t want to go back to being in the ditch with george bush. there has to be a positive argument. it seems pretty obvious, their polling focus groups say the things you have done are not popular an in this you want to do couldn t sell. brings up a great point. we around this table all the