top of the other surprise you don t know about. laura: exactly. wouldn t that be funny. sean: you re telling me what s on my own show that s priceless. by the way we would love to have you, please come. laura: all right. sean: we ll do both shows back-to-back. laura: that would be awesome. we ll take it under advisement. that sounds fun. sean: get out of here. laura: double trouble. all right hannity awesome show tonight and i am laura ingraham this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight and we begin with a midterm hail mary from the democrats. we knew it was coming right? and if there s anything we ve learned it s that joe biden loves telling tall tales and over the past couple of months his white house seems to have caught the same fever at least when it comes to furnituring that reputation. it will take more time and resolve to bring inflation down which is again why we passed the inflation reduction act, we meaning democrats, not republicans. what
that is also true. they can t both be right. well. that is also true. they can t both be right. well, sometimes - that is also true. they can t both be right. well, sometimes you l that is also true. they can t both l be right. well, sometimes you can that is also true. they can t both - be right. well, sometimes you can do thins be right. well, sometimes you can do thin . s that be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you think be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you think are things that you think are constitutionally a bit weird. if it will help constitutionally a bit weird. if it will help the general because of fighting will help the general because of fighting the pandemic. let me summarise, i think there is an issue summarise, i think there is an issue it summarise, i think there is an issue it is summarise, i think there is an issue. it is not a huge, huge issue. not as issue.
they were asking him to yank this medication off the shelves. the judge even asks the plaintiffs point to another case in which the judge did exactly what you re asking me to do. and the plaintiffs couldn t point to a case and alison that s what makes this case so unprecedented because it s the first of its kind. that s really interesting . rosa also these anti abortion plaintiffs, as you re saying, wanted this case before this specific judge. so why. you know this is fascinating because if you ask abortion advocacy groups, they will say that there was judge shopping here. so here s the background. this judge judge matthew has merrick was appointed by president donald trump, and before this judge rose to the federal bench . he worked for a religious rite . offerman on anti abortion advocacy and who are the plaintiffs? in this case? they are anti abortion groups. and so, abortion advocates have said , and they maintain that the there was judge shopping in this
this medication off the shelves. the judge even asks the plaintiffs point to another case in which the judge did exactly what you re asking me to do. and the plaintiffs couldn t point to a case and alison that s what makes this case so unprecedented because it s the first of its kind. that s really interesting . rosa also these anti abortion plaintiffs, as you re saying, wanted this case before this specific judge. so why. you know this is fascinating because if you ask abortion advocacy groups, they will say that there was judge shopping here. so here s the background. this judge judge matthew cause. merrick was appointed by president donald trump. and bere this judge rose to the federal bench. he worked for a religious rite lawford on anti abortion advocacy. and who aret? they are anti abortion groups. and so abortion said, and they maintain that the there was judge shopping in this
taking abortion bills and that might have sounded wacky a couple of years ago but it does seem like at least conservative in conservative states, it s a real possibility. you know what i would like to see democrats begin to do is that every time one of these pieces of legislation are put up by republicans, i would like democrats to start putting up legislation that would require these states to actually take care of children. to provide free day care, to provide universal pre-k. to put up things like, if you actually care about children and you care about families, then this is what it looks like. because you are forcing people to carry unwanted pregnancies for no reason. you are not medical doctors. who are politicians. and to the senators point, yes, we should be looking at the medical professionals to dictate what needs to happen. not a politician who is never opened up a medical book. or who couldn t point out the uterus. please! it s ridiculous. democrats need to use this as