transactions and some did not report that no one would have to report for the purposes exactly the article said. it is to influence the outcome of the court and to do so illegitimately by their democrats in congress to impose restrictions on the justices in order to exert more control over their lives part of the lives of their spouses. and ultimately to influence outcomes. justices need to recuse themselves or replace it. and so it really affects the makeup of the court and how cases are decided. shannon: is coming at the backdrop of a bipartisan called the senate a bill to foresee justices to write and adopt the. to conduct. there is an interesting opinion piece in the washington post that said it is possible that is one branch infringing on another and there really separate for good reason and there are corruption laws their patient for the justices they are still subjected to those kinds of things. quickly the constitution by the supreme court obviously subject to checks and ba
some of them accurately reported transactions and some did not report that no one would have to report for the purposes exactly the article said. it is to influence the outcome of the court and to do so illegitimately by their democrats in congress to impose restrictions on the justices in order to exert more control over their lives part of the lives of their spouses. and ultimately to influence outcomes. justices need to recuse themselves or replace it. and so it really affects the makeup of the court and how cases are decided. shannon: is coming at the backdrop of a bipartisan called the senate a bill to foresee justices to write and adopt the. to conduct. there is an interesting opinion piece in the washington post that said it is possible that is one branch infringing on another and there really separate for good reason and there are corruption laws their patient for the justices they are still subjected to those kinds of things. quickly the constitution by the supreme court o
court, in your view, watering down federal corruption laws. you write, quote, the supreme court has shown recent penchant for gutting the ability of prosecutors to pursue elected officials even beyond the president. you go on to say the only way this can be solved is through congress. i should note that there is, and we ve talked about this, this bigger argument and idea whether it comes to former virginia governor bob mcconnell or current new jersey senator bob m menendez, what some people call the criminalization of politics. there s a lot of, you do this for me, i ll do this for you, without quid pro quos being annunciated what do you mean? for all the division on the supreme court, the one thing that they ve really been unanimous on the last several years is until narrowing down the scope of the corruption laws. we ve seen a series of decisions out of the supreme court that have made it all but impossible for federal prosecutors to bring corruption charges. in fact, since this
Global Investigations Review (GIR) is the hub for global coverage of corporate investigations and their aftermath. Keep up to date with significant developments in the corporate investigations world.
though she hasn t had the warmest welcome. she says she s hoping to stabilize the country and regain support. by bringing elections forward two years and promising to end corruption. it s a political crisis that is now reverberating across latin america with regional allies such as bolivia and mexico weighing in only fueling further peru s political divide. isa soares, cnn. all right. quick hits around the globe right now. in about two hours south african lawmakers will debate a report that found embattled president broke corruption laws, stole a large sum of money. they ll vote whether to impeach him. russian president vladimir putin has canceled his annual news conference ducking his answers about potential failure in ukraine. hospitals in china are being