Question that was asked hits the nail on the head. This is a Good Opportunity to take a look at what the next steps are. My friends at the labor unions is the reality is the ports are shifting from a maritime port to a real estate port area. Im happy those two items were fused together. If were going to have any success were to have to tie them hand in hand because no one is successful without the other. I have a long history with the areas its crowded. At one point it wasnt crowded but how we manage success weve got a pilot and well see what sticks and what doesnt but my advice so to remain as flexible as we can. This is an intelligent approach and i think that were in a new era to collect data to make better decisions and i hope we stay open this path and not get distracted. It would be great to have a little bit of a dream study to show modest changes and it is so ridiculously expensive to do anything on the port we end up for projects to be penciled anti if were able to lower the C
Oernz and i have already had several conversations with Deputy District Attorney how the Planning Department can verify the structure. The department could require some evidence from the pleasant such as articles of corporates corporation and theres an existing process for Code Violations for the board of appeals. If a third party shows evidence the department can initiate the process and if the Department Finds theyre in violation they could deny the application. There are a variety of procedural means and the fact that those procedures are not defined means the procedures should be redefined. It already states that if something is a city formula use. The burden is on the formula stores. It should be of the 10 finding for section 603 of the planning code 4 deal with the size and structure of the company and one deals with the aesthetics. Finding two, that San Francisco meditates to protect Small Businesses and it stays within the local Committee Without going to local offices and item
I guess in short perhaps to commissioner moores suggestion if they want to have a more detailed presentation about the waterfront land it would not be complete without talking about those public trust questions youre raising. In general just like you as a Planning Commission need to look at how our policies evolve and trond different kinds of legislation. The public trust principles are principle and they evolve over time and we found even though we may not always agree that we have a very open and collaborative relationship that has allowed the state Lands Commission to look at the waterfront and urban waterfront with the Historic District thats listed on the national raerj and take into account a lot of the land use issues to factor into the trust their determinations. Thats how weve been able to achieve the project so far. Some of the projects beyond the china channel we have very informative and intelligent and seasoned experience to work through those issues if i may followup the
Commissioner borden. Yeah. Thank you very much for this report. I have a question about the transportation. Are there some shoefrment improvements we can see and id like to have the possibility of the streetcars in the direction of the ball park and we have other slow transportation issues the e line youll see running this summer are its one of the americans cup pilots. So for all the streetcars to use that corridor they have a loop. We have a stub end you can only use those streetcars that have a cab for the front and back. So with that said were going to run it this summer it was scruff successful last year. The f line i can go telling me tell you that the most important thing is the speed and if somebody goes to meet with someone on the pier im shut out of this train i want though make sure i can not be late to my meetings so were going to be testing this summer to have a fleet of streetcars that step in and fill that gap because the f line is a long line. So the crowds we can give