sharing my roots. don t stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. that does that tell you where don t take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve this is likely to end up in the or abnormal bleeding. senate at all? it gives us grave concern, while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, yeah. it isn t just about this moment like unusual bruising. for impeachment. it s about a review of the last eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. three years. the abuse of power by this tell your doctor about all planned medical president and on the flip side, the willingness of so many or dental procedures. eliquis, the number one cardiologist-prescribed elected republicans to either assist the president or just blood t
so i think it is true that it was tactically an error for mitch mcconnell to announce in advance that the trial was going to be rigged because it does back the moderates in his party into a corner. do those moderates, people like lisa murkowski, she s not even one that s up for re-election. do they feel backed into a corner? they don t like that mcconnell put them in this position. they want to listen to the evidence and they wanted it to be run right and mcconnell made it seem oh, we re going to have this in the senate, we re going to aquit and then we re done and that really put them in the spot where they are saying we don t want to do that. we don t like your strategy, you re hurting us. is there a sense on the hill among republicans, martha mcsally got appointed to the seat because she lost and then got appointed. corey gardener, who is in big
talk about mitt romney, corey gardener, is lisa putting something out there that could be cover for the others to also say yeah, we have concerns about the senate republicans working hand in glove with the white house on this? potentially i think we have to see where this goes. there is always value in being the first if you want to make a break and make it clear for your own political prospects, it helps to be first, murkowski is the first defection. we ll see if anyone else decides to are voice some concerns and the intentions will seem the same. it strikes me right now that the battle we re having that is largely rhetorical is something that we will have for the rest of this year and for all of next year. there isn t a real venue aside from public comments and letters that the president sends or tweets, there is not an
to testify like mick mulvaney. the question is whether they re going to go with institutional considerations or partisan considerations. there was a lot of focus on democrats where trump carried their districts. now we have republicans in swing states for 2020 like corey gardener, susan collins. they on one hand are unlikely to break from the president on the ultimate issue. i think they need to convey to their voters they re taking this seriously. to some extent the balance has been reversed in terms of which party faces the tougher political consideration. there are a few democrats who will be cross-pressured as well. there are two lanes on that
bad for democrats and good for republicans, if that was the case, mitch mccom would want a long trial, part of the reason he does not is that he knows that everything says the rules, the witnesses they want to bring, all in the hands of their most vulnerable members. . it just requires 51 votes. they have 53 republicans. corey gardener and susan collins will walk the plank on everything we do, creating the atmosphere which is why they re hearing they want this short trial. thing number two is the democrats that i taurked to say they had overwhelming evidence to move forward, but they they