This week saw Canada, Mexico and the United States present their respective positions and legal arguments, often in sharply worded exchanges, about how the Auto Core Parts rules of.
preconscious attentional desires. which is to say all the algorithm does is surface the stuff that grabs our limbic system. the brainstem, the core parts of us, the parts that are sort of the most ancient, right, and least associated with, like, contempttive consciousness, threat, fear, lust, all that stuff that the seven deadly sins. i don t want to say, like, the problem is us. but the reason it s dangerous is because of its efficiency of grabbing something in it as opposed to foisting something onto us. was there a question there? that it s not foisting something onto us. it is grabbing something within us, which gives it power? correct. it s like a harmonic frequency. you are throwing up a tuner and resonating but you are resonating for the parts of us that are the seven deadly sins. it s against all wisdom
regular marketplace, with an invisible hand of adam, smith again we have the digital hand of zuckerberg, that everybody has to appeal to, that is a new species of power, when it talks about three billion people who are plugged into that system. again, it s not the algorithm, the key point is here is that the algorithm is just a very efficient means of aggregating pre conscious attentional desires. which is to say, all the algorithm does, is surface the stuff that grabs our olympic system, in the stuff that grabs erwin big system, which is the brain stem, the core parts of us, the parts that are sort of the most ancient, and at least associated with consciousness, is threat, fear, lost, all that the seven deadly sins, i don t want to say the problem is, us but the reason it s dangerous, is precisely because if it s efficiency of grabbing something in, us as posing throwing something on to us. what was the question there? then it s not voicing
ruling and then we ll end up in the supreme court and hopefully we ll get a fair shake and we ll win in the supreme court. notwithstanding the unusual delivery, the president there, david, talked about it shouldn t be there and then he said bad ruling twice. so there s no real sense of the application of justice and fair-mindedness and judges who will consider something. it s either bad or good in his mind. that s right. it s very outcome-oriented. and we know that president trump rejects all kinds of core parts of our constitutional system. he rejects separation of powers. he rejects all kinds of things. and so far we ve seen congress really bend to his will. the republicans in congress. they ve basically for the most part done whatever he has wanted. the courts so far have mostly held. they have pushed back against the president when he has tried to do extralegal things. they ve pushed back against the president when he s been sloppy. and so that is something to be to feel very
win in the supreme court. notwithstanding the unusual delivery, the president there, david, talked about it shouldn t be there and then he said bad ruling twice. so there s no real sense of the application of justice and fair-mindedness and judges who will consider something. it s either bad or good in his mind. that s right. it s very outcome-oriented. and we know that president trump rejects all kinds of core parts of our constitutional system. he rejects separation of powers. he rejects all kinds of things. and so far we ve seen congress really bend to his will. the republicans in congress. they ve basically for the most part done whatever he has wanted. the courts so far have mostly held. they have pushed back against the president when he has tried to do extralegal things. they ve pushed back against the president when he s been sloppy. and so that is something to be to feel very good about. the one reason to have some anxiety about this is what trump said at the end of that