the witness stand. all of us debated beforehand will we see kyle rittenhouse on the wind stand, obviously it worked and do you agree that he had no choice but to do that. not as a matter of law, but yes, i think as a matter of strategy, he had no choice. you have to put your client on the stand if you re claiming self-defense. it was interesting to hear the defense say they had two mock juries. we can debate the value of mock juries, but he did much better from the defense standpoint, when they put their client on the stand. kyle rittenhouse, the prosecution did not do much to undermine him. they pointed out some sort of minor inconsistencies and things he said on the night of, and later. nothing that undermines the core defense argument which was he was attacked. every time he s shot, he was attacked, whether with a gun by gaij graij goross i want to go to you because you know jurors, you re a jury
even an impeachble event. note that while pretending to shoot down that story, the president is actually giving it attention on twitter and endorsing the core defense argument that republicans are looking at any quid pro quo, bribery, would not be impeachable. fact check. false. bribery is impeachable. it s actually one of only two specified offenses listed as imab impeachable. we were discussing this earlier in the show. it is up to the senate to decide what to do in any trial, but bribery is one of the most impeachable examples you could possibly come up with. those senators are not the only potential jurors in a trump-related trial. you know what starts tomorrow? jury selection in the trial of roger stone for witness tampering. if the house does impeach donald trump, it is now entirely possible that both he and his long-time adviser could be awaiting verdicts at the same time. and the senators are facing voters who increasingly back