the flattery are such a constant now, and they have been ever since he was named to donald trump s ticket in july of 2016. like you said, i covered him on the campaign. the cadences, the lines, they re all the same. you know, he just sort of is on repeat. he sticks to the script, and he makes sure he s always praising president trump. who is mike pence? i don t know. he doesn t really seem to have core convictions or beliefs beyond whatever donald trump s decided they are. he used to be for the transpacific partnership. now he s against it. he spoke out against the muslim ban before he was the nominee. on the campaign trail, he defended it as extreme vetting. he is whatever donald trump wants him to be, and i think that s why so many people sort of see him as kind of phony because he and his staffers work so hard to make sure that they re seen as loyal to trump, and the rest of us see someone who doesn t seem to have a lot of beliefs beyond making sure donald trump feels good. jackie
they hire more. the problem is it s not as simple as the president thinks. there s a lot of mixtures of different types of, you know, aluminum. there s coding, everything else like that. the president is trying to touch a difficult issuings and he essentially did the decision without thinking it through. in the end, he has no core convictions. had he stuck to some core convictions, thor reoughly talk about it, they would have told him they need to go at it slowly and not lash out like an immature leader. the fear from economists right now and so many republicans, especially in the house and the senate is that consumers are going to have to spend more on their cars for all sorts of other products if there is a full scale trade war of some of the other countries that are going to be impacted by the steel and aluminum tariffs, like to go after u.s. experts. again, that s when consumers stop buying, actually, it affects the american worker.
can t someone say what he wants or not say what he wants? can you really compel someone to say something he doesn t believe? you re absolutely right. the constitution protects blaine and others. it protectssmein the right of creative professionals not to b. forced to create messages, express messages, or celebrate events that violate their core convictions. if we want that freedom for ourselves, we have to extend it to those with whom we disagree. tucker: could i be sued for not writing a certain kind of novel or not having a certain kind of guest on this show? i mno serious. could i be, by k the left? you are spot-on, tucker. these laws will be applied to the left as well as the right. could a republican speechwriter be forced to write for a democrat? we are seeing these laws beo applied across the united states, and there is a case pending right at the supreme court that has thesepl issues. it is whether someone can be forced to express messages and convey ideas that violate th
i m a little confused, because we do have the first amendment. can t someone say what he wants or not say what he wants. can you really compel someone to say something he doesn t believe? you re absolutely right. the constitution protects blaine and others. it protects the right of creative professionals not to be forced to create messages, express messages, or celebrate events that sell violate their core convictions. if we want that freedom for ourselves, we have to extend it to those with whom we disagree. tucker: could i be sued for not writing a certain kind of novel or not having a certain kind of guest on this show? i m serious. could i be, by the left? you are spot-on, tucker. these laws will be applied to the left as well as the right. could a republican speechwriter be forced or a democrat? we are seeing these laws be applied across the united states, and there is a case pending right out the supreme court that has these issues. it is whether someone can be forced to ex
can t someone say what he wants or not say what he wants. can you really compel someone to say something he doesn t believe? you re absolutely right. the constitution protects blaine and others. it protects the right of creative professionals not to be forced to create messages, express messages, or celebrate events that sell violate their core convictions. if we want that freedom for ourselves, we have to extend it to those with whom we disagree. tucker: could i be sued for not writing a certain kind of novel or not having a certain kind of guest on this show? i m serious. could i be, by the left? you are spot-on, tucker. these laws will be applied to the left as well as the right. could a republican speechwriter be forced or a democrat? we are seeing these laws be applied across the united states, and there is a case pending right out the supreme court that has these issues. it is whether someone can be forced to express messages and to convey ideas that violate the core of who