to m next was done in august. before i move on to my next question, was done in august. before i move on to my next question, you was done in august. before i move on to my next question, you say - was done in august. before i move on to my next question, you say it - to my next question, you say it wasn t relevant in the earlier period. forthose wasn t relevant in the earlier period. for those on low incomes who kept the country going, working in food processing plants, in transport, in social care through lockdown, it was highly relevant, wasn t it? . , wasn t it? and there was considerable wasn t it? and there was considerable support - wasn t it? and there was considerable support in i wasn t it? and there was - considerable support in place for the most considerable support in place for the most vulnerable, as i have documented in my previous answers. not only documented in my previous answers. not only did documented in my previous answers. not only did we
for instance, roger stone, here in d.c., they re taking the lead on that. of course prosecutors in manhattan taking the lead on michael cohen. the president s former lawyer. what are the next steps in all of this? sometime this weekend the attorney general will be sending some sort of a summary, we understand to folks on capitol hill. that s right. the next battle on the horizon is between the justice department and lawmakers. our understanding is that bill barr will put together what he is describing as his conclusions from the special counsel s report. so not actually the report itself but his takeaways, his core conclusions will be conveyed to lawmakers as soon as tomorrow and they ll also be conveyed to the public. so this will not be some sort of secret covert action whatsoever, but it s not the report itself which of course is what congress wants to get their hands on, anderson. and do we expect the attorney general to make any remarks? we don t expect to see him
itself but his takeaways, his core conclusions will be conveyed to lawmakers as soon as tomorrow and they ll also be conveyed to the public. so this will not be some sort of secret covert action whatsoever, but it s not the report itself which of course is what congress wants to get their hands on, anderson. and do we expect the attorney general to make any remarks? we don t expect to see him make a public statement or any sort of press conference or anything like that. i m told he has basically spoken tonight through his statement to congress but we do expect the principle conclusions, his distallation of what he was to answer a core mission of what he was appointed to do and that s to get to the bottom of whether the trump campaign conspired with the russian government to interfere in the 2016 election and that should be answered by this anderson. all right. i appreciate it. i know you had a long day and great work. thank you so much. so the bottom line at this hour
you can find it on our website if you haven t seen it yet. it s rebuttal to the nunes memo. this rebuttal is six pages long. it challenges the core conclusions of the nunes memo. you can see the summary here on screen right now. but to understand what we want to do here to take you through the timeline of the nunes memo and then fact check it starting with this. mr. comey had a chance in january, february, march, april, i believe all the way until june to come clean on who paid for the dossier. he was asked about it in january and he said very clearly that he knew republicans had started the dossier, which was a lie. and then when asked and probed further, well, who finished the dossier, he didn t know. in reality the dossier was initially funded by republicans. the conservative news outlet, the washington free beacon, led by republican billionaire paul singer, big donor, admitted to
you figure that one out. they are harvard graduates. they are experienced lawyers. they are 27 years in the department. rachel has had a number of years in the department previously. and so they both represent the kind of quality in leadership that we want in the department. that was president trump and attorney general jeff sessions talking about rod rosenstein. trump and sessions having different feelings about the man who overcease the mueller investigation. jerry nadler releasing a e rebuttal to the memo in the last hour. that six-page rebuttal challenging the core conclusions of the nunes memo. let s bring in frank montoya, former fbi special agent.