either further increase taxes on the middle class or break her commitment to these benefits. the mathematical gymnastics is designed to hide the simple truth from voters. to accomplish this a slight of hand, her proposal dramatically understates its cost, over states its savings and inflates the revenue and pretends an employers personal payroll tax increase is something else. here was some of the reaction from the trail. i think the biggest issue i m hearing from voters, though, even above and beyond having to pay for this is am i going to lose my private plan. and that s something that i just haven t heard well, we have heard an answer but i think it s the wrong answer. so even as the economists over the numbers and math, i think other core concerns have not been answered. what is just not true is that
allies. you ve got to work with other countries, and to have those partnershi partnerships, you have to help them in what they need. we have failed to show these country that is we care about their core concerns. angela merkel and many others have said we need to begin planning without counting on the united states. and that is not just their needs. that s going to come back and create real cost for the united states on all of the big causes we re going to care about. some sohave staggering significance for the safety and future of the rest of the world. katelyn, what s your readout in terms of what you saw? i just want to pick up on a few points. this is a huge deal. this has implications all thoov the place. trade alone has impacts on pocketbooks. that can we can see that can have effects on the global economy as well. then trade isn t just about
in jerusalem and let us together go and speak with the prime minister of israel benjamin netanyahu to express to him our commitment together that the settlements are not moving us forward and to really address the core concerns. to engage with us. to work constructively. the act of divestment is not going to move us closer to a two-state solution. in fact, it will harden those in the extremes, it will give them more reason to oppose movement forward on the two-state solution. the action that the church took is exactly the wrong approach to moving forward and building the infrastructure for peace, building the momentum and the good will. that s the way we would move forward and by choose divest. over engagement the church sent a very loud message that they really are not interested in the partnership that we so very much want and extended to them. quickly before i get to the question i planned, do you commit to that conversation, dr.
find from other mothers as their core concerns once they re in the situation of incarceration, what are the things they want to be able to do to continue to parent? well, i think their first concern is the safety of their child no matter what, and they do know it is a hardship on many families taking care of their children. most families that are taking care of their children struggle. their own family members struggle to bring the children up to see them, so moms are worried about whether they get to see them, how they re doing in school, whether they re fairing well. children walk around with a lot of embarrassment. it is not something you can talk about where your mom is. and then family members and foster parents may not be completely honest with the children they re taking care of, so the child needs to know what is exactly going on, and it s the responsibility of the mom and those that are taking care of the child during their parent s incarceration. you make that point about
the u.s. council of bishops announced it was too soon to tell physical the change addressed their core concerns. president obama announced that insurance companies will pick up the tab directly. joining meรง now is tim cane. thank you so much frp your time. you were one of the democrats who came out expressing concern with the initial policy from the president. is what we heard from the president today enough for you? i think it s a very fine solution. my concern was first the white house was right. i was very glad they included the contraception mandate as part of the affordable care act. i did not believe it was broad enough. the church affiliate institutions might have to purchase contraception if it was against church doctrine.