reporter: 70% banned using sharia law in courtrooms. the court of appeals says not so fast, that ban is unconstitutional because it discriminates against religions. here is how the state amendment actually reads, quote, the courts shall not look to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures specifically the court shall not consider interest nation until or sharia law. backers of that amendment insist that it was intended to ban all religious laws, and islamic law was merely named as an example, not a specific attack on muslims. but the higher cordis agreed. quote, that argument conflicts with the amendments plain language which mentioned sharia law in two places. not only that, but the court said that backers knew of no cases in which an oklahoma court had ever applied sharia will you or even used any legal precepts of other countries. the plaintiff, a muslim argued