Can internet service providers necessarily be compelled to unmask anonymous copyright infringers? North District of California in this instance they said no,granting Twitter’s motion to quash a subpoena seeking to reveal information behind an anonymous poster
the driver and cookie monster are now in custody. a monkey who just wanted to take a selfie taking his legal battle to an appeals court. seriously. the monkey snapped pictures with the photographer s came are a that then ended up in nature book. peta sued saying copyright owner and needs a piece of the action. the monkey has no use for money. the judge last year wasn t monkeying around ruling copy rights don t extend to on malls. former nfl quarterback peyton manning opening up about that game of golf with president trump last month. now, manning defending his decision to hit the links with the president. take a listen. i had a lot of people tell me not to do it. i heard arnold palmer one time if the president of the united states ever asks you to play golf, do you it. it was a no-brainer. it was a fantastic experience. it would have been unamerican to say no. jillian: manning called the president the great host. revealed the two were on the same team.
1893 should be considered part of the public domain. it s fighting to pay a license fee of $1,500 to the copyright owner, warner chapel, which has not he hasn t responded to cnn about the case. monica, who knew happy birthday was copyrighted? is it true this group could ask you for money if they heard you sing this at your kid s birthday party? we ve all done it. they have been doing that. not for the little private ceremony. they do it mostly for public performances. like in movies or tv shows. the plaintiffs in this lawsuit are basically saying, hey, look, you can t do this. first of all, it was never copyrighted. at least not officially. or if it was, it has run out. and, number two, this is part of the public domain. how can you possibly stick a copyright on this and make everybody pay you for it? yeah. they have a really good basis for their suit. joey, 30 seconds. sure. listen, here s the deal.
we are breaking news from the supreme court. it is about copyright which sounds boring but nbc s pete williams is outside with the latest. if you ve ever sold anything on ebay or had a garage sale you might want to listen up. reporter: or a flea market or church raffle or used book store or garage sale. anything like that. this case involves a doctrine that is used thousands of times in america, millions every day. what it says, if you go to the book store and you buy a book or a cd or a video, you re free to then sell it. it s called the first sale doctrine. what that means is once you buy it then the copyright owner s interest in that work extinguishes once you buy it. the question in this case is, does that apply to things that are made overseas? now, that would apply, of course, to any book printed overseas but also that used car that you want to sell that s made overseas, made in japan, that s got copyrighted things in it. watches, computers, anything