Decisions that often come out. That is a crude split. Justices do not line up in any particular way. Labels, ict on those dont think theyre particularly helpful in articulating anyone who is a judge, what their philosophy would be. It is not the goal of a judge to come into it with a preconceived vision. You are supposed to decide cases. That is how i would approach it. You have written that you were concerned with decisions that only looked to Prior Supreme Court opinions, statutes, regulations. You said that this kind of constitutional decisionmaking without looking to lot refuse, literature, treaties can be called cranach and technical cramped and technical. What role would lot reviews lot refuse having your judicial lot reviews law reviews having your judicial . I want to clarify on that comment. That writing with the blog post. It was making an early observation about opinions from a justice. I noted in that same post that there was also much to be said law approach. The certainly