commission to serve? there are currently in my judgment, senator, inadequate protections for precluding that from happening. so a sex offender could, in fact, find their way into the arm forces of the united states and, in fact, there s cases where conviction wouldn t automatically result in a discharge. obviously, we have to fix that. you would agree? absolutely. so there you have it, the military admits that sexual predators are getting in unchecked, but what happens once they re serving? where are the protections for their potential victims in this service? it turns out, we have a bit of a problem there, too. just listen to this senator criticize the military for both letting in the bad guys then not dealing with them appropriately once they enlist. there are pro problems, one is you sexual predators who are committing crimes.
guess what so when you think about enforcement and whether or not an officer wants to get involved in that when it is highly speculative and somebody is going to sue them and say you pulled me over, you infringed my rights. you were racial profiling and didn t like the way i was driving there was a whole host of problems here. good luck with the officers even trying to put this report together. let alone presenting it to the prosecutors for punishment and filing of the case. that s why it s no surprise now that colorado hasn t even set the standard. soeah, you can go there and drive. what s going to happen to you really nothing? because legally speaking, a conviction wouldn t be upheld because they haven t even defined a standard. make any cases. you can be pulled over for reckless driving though. a cop sees you swerving. bill: yeah, if do you something, sure. if you go 8 miles per hour or something like that, look, here is the deal. and this is the truth. by legalizing marijua
this. guess what so when you think about enforcement and whether or not an officer wants to get involved in that when it is highly speculative and somebody is going to sue them and say you pulled me over, you infringed my rights. you were racial profiling and didn t like the way i was driving there was a whole host of problems here. good luck with the officers even trying to put this report together. let alone presenting it to the prosecutors for punishment and filing of the case. that s why it s no surprise now that colorado hasn t even set the standard. so technically, yeah, you can go there and drive. what s going to happen to you really nothing? because legally speaking, a conviction wouldn t be upheld because they haven t even defined a standard. make any cases. you can be pulled over for reckless driving though. a cop sees you swerving. bill: yeah, if do you something, sure. if you go 8 miles per hour or something like that, look, here is the deal. and this is the truth.
what s going to happen to you really nothing? because legally speaking, a conviction wouldn t be upheld because they haven t even defined a standard. make any cases. you can be pulled over for reckless driving though. a cop sees you swerving. bill: yeah, if do you something, sure. if you go 8 miles per hour or something like that, look, here is the deal. and this is the truth. by legalizing marijuana or any other substance, you add to the drunk driving problem. you compound it. but, with drunk driving, whether you have a fairly quick way to determine, pot, you don t. and as guilfoyle rightly says, it s not going to be anybody prosecuted. you you have people going out there like this. is that sane public policy? you are bringing up exact point. when you want to go and check the numbers of how many of these cases going to file. they are not going to file them. not going to be cases that are going to be taken by the d.a. they are going to reject them. i have got to move ahead to