you re concerned about. read some materials about it. and that s where the conversation starts. in the heart of texas last table on the left will check in you in. little more serious. that s great. reporter: 526 americans gath gathering. i love this. great. thank you so much. reporter: upset about the partisan divide. let s be real. reporter: this is an experiment. a scientific sample. democrat, republican, and independent representing 47 states. you are going to listen to other people whom you never ordinary would encounter. reporter: reflecting who votes on election day. hey, how are you? reporter: it s a four-day in-person poll called america in one room.
and thank you for joining us this morning. a couple issues at hand, the conversation begins with what is offensive and who determines what is offensive? i made my own flowchart. helpful for most colleges to hand out. kind of complicated so i break it down. do you want to wear a costume? yes, no, do what you want should be where the conversation starts. that we are even having a conversation about the offensiveness of halloween costumes and the second sue is universities are initiating these conversations and we see this on college campuses that professors, administrators, liberal leaning students are dominating the conversation about culture so that no one is allowed to speak up and suggest it is a bit absurd that we spend
are they out front and center making an argument? is she really going to take mantle for the democrats? i don t think so. i think this speech is something that she s going to probably regret. i think she will have the thumb put on her by leadership. who is the better person to deliver that message? that s what they re trying to find out. what you have, the most prominent names are biden, sanders, warren. all three would be in their 70s in 2020. i ll not sure any of the three of them would run but that seems to be where the conversation starts. think of types here, think of amy from minnesota. somebody who, she has that midwestern appeal. it is an interesting contrast to trump.
way to do diplomacy. i m just saying that this is how the conversation starts. in business, and you say did he agree to take refugees? no, no, i m the new ceo, and i am not abiding by the deal. and you have to be very tough out of the gate to say i am not honoring that deal. now that you brought donkeys into it the problem as it is such a linear argument against australia. 499 years we have had an allied relationship with australia, they have fought in every american war since world war i alongside americans. we currently right now have troops and marines based in durban, australia. why start an argument in this way with one of america s closest and most valued allies? and i understand that everyone comes to the table saying, this is how it s done a business, this is how it s done in business, but they re still the question of, how do we treat our allies, because this is not a business deal, and diplomacy is an entirely different thing. for me, the idea that we could have soldier
if trump continues with other campaign promises and it calls china a currency manipulator, china will respond to that. that is where you get a trade war. that will be devastating. trump want to pursue bilateral trade deals. andrew stevens, thank you. that is rejection of the past 30 or 40 years of philosophy from both parties in washington. it is really a reversal of everything we know from the second half of the 20th century. it will be fascinating. this is what leaders are trying to get their heads around. do you take the campaign promises literally or is that a starting point and the conversation starts. part of a bigger negotiation. and the negotiation before the final deal is done. up next, a deadly school bus crash in chattanooga.