Countries die from our economic brutality but they cant be bothered to speed up approval of blood tests that prevent cancer neither can our Corporate Media. Because they dont serve us they serve corporate state interests and curing cancer is not in the interest of the corporate state how many of from washington d. C. The belle of the base is a reactive and i. Welcome welcome on leave camp outside news from behind folks ive got some bad news we all know big businesses are struggling right now Many Companies like j. C. Penney mens warehouse and lord and taylor have declared bankruptcy without mens wearhouse where will i go for all my men. And without lord taylor where will i go for all my lords god only knows this reminds me of that tragic moment when radio shack went out of business and since that day i havent been able to find a stolid radio nor a top notch shack anywhere nor an adapter that hooks a turkey based or up to a ham radio thanksgiving is ruined kids sorry but its not just bi
For years they tested more than 123000 healthy individuals in ties to china which required building a specialized warehouse to store the more than 1600000 samples they eventually accrued yeah thats a big gross warehouse. Samples of wasnt. Any way over the following 10 years around a 1000 participants got cancer and using the new blood test the researchers knew up to 4 years in advance which participants would get it with a 90 percent accuracy rate they knew the researchers looked at the test and said this person will get cancer years from now this person will get cancer and they were right 90 percent of the time thats incredible its only heard of now heres my problem with this being able to know whos going to get cancer long before symptoms arise could save millions all the lives. So why are we rushing this through this could save more lives than curing coronavirus oh lets get on it but why why why why is this drug not plastered across Brian Williams foreheads rumors sean hannity. I kn
Mr. No. Mr. Apologies. Please let me kw if thi is messing you up. Were trying to get coordinated here. Shets to amend the agenda to go with treasurers report ten minutes, Audit Committee report ten minutes, followed by election of the Party Officers and the national committee. Theres no time certain for followed by nominations of Party Candidates for president and Vice President. Theres no time certain for that. Foy b rules committee report. No time certain. Followed by platform. Followed by resolutions. No time certain. Followed by other business. No time certain. Tomorrow morning at 7 30 a. M. We want to put our president ial debate. The question is i think our secondaryderstand what do we put how do we actually order this written down . I thini unrstand it perfectly. Okay. So im going to anticipate that were going through elections through the end of the day. Then were going to tomorrow morning with a debate. Does that work . Madame chair, microphone one. Got it. Point of informatio
Need to be rea for anything. Support cspan as a Public Service along with these other television providers, giving you a frontrow seat to democracy. The Libertarian Party is holding its national convention. They voted on procedures and nominating ahead of the president ial candidate on may 26. Some members of the party voiced opposition to Donald Trumps speech which was scheduled for may 25 as well as opposition to libertarian chair, angela. [inaudible conversations] madame chair, microphone two. Were coming back to order. Were trying to work through some bylaws issues. I call for the orders of the day. We are orders of the day at 2 00 p. M. We are gaveled back. The next item on the agenda is adoption of the agenda. Mic one. Pennsylvania would like to make a motion to add three alternate delegates on to the convention floor. By 7 8 vote. By 7 8 vote. Three alternate delegates. Point of order, madame chair. Point of order. Thats not related to the agenda. Okay. Were on adoption of the a
Ok, we are Getting Started whether youre sitting or not. Thank you for a much. We are going to be moving to the amendments that were tabled yesterday. We are going to start basically in the order they are in the document. The first ones we will discuss are in the unpledged section, specifically in reference to number five, recommendation number five. I first ask if there are no objections, i would like to take this off the table, the discussion. I see no objections. Can we please put this up on the screen . Focused one recommendation number five, under the unpledged section, because of some of the work that is done, there are some adjustments to recommendations number four, which was passed yesterday. Sk that we consider number i ask that as we consider number consider adjustments to number four and we will vote on a combination of the two. We will move forward and highlight the adjustments here. All right. Ok. I will just read through this quickly. You can paraphrase, you dont have to