if you look at the record of president obama, whether it is leading from behind in libya or drawing red lines in syria, or empathizing with the muslim brotherhood in egypt, you ask yourself if he understands what he is up against and up against people set to destroy and kill civilization. i have to ask you one quick question we are almost out of time. secretary john kerry said massive increases in israeli settlements is to blame for the violence. the normal national security advisor says that is not non-sense and settlement growth hasn t actually increased. who is right? abe is right and john kerry
you going to convince the american people that it s worth it? because it s our problem. show them the magazines isis is producing and the publications coming out from al qaeda. they talk about attacking america. they talk about recruiting americans to join their cause and raise the black flag of isis over the white house and attack americans here in the homeland, how they are going to target servicemen and women in their homes and community for killing and beheading. they are not satisfied with controlling syria and iraq. they want to conquer the world. they want to destroy israel and ultimately they want to come after us here in the united states and they are actively trying to do it now. this notion if we leave them alone they will leave us alone just isn t true. they are there today but they are trying to come here now because they believe it is their calling to conquer the world in
mutana. iraq may have had more chemical arms but the inspectors weren t working in the crossfire of conflict. as one expert noted in a world weary of wars, any deal that avoids another conflict may be welcomed but there are still important questions to be asked. does it help the people on the ground inside syria? or simply salve the conscience of the world outside. jim clancy is, jerusalem. some of those chemical weapons could end up in the hands of hezbollah. israel very, very involved in keeping an eye on those, as well. the obama administration is going to have to account and answer questions. we re waiting for today s white house briefing expected any moment now. they re late again. it usually slips a little. that is typical. we expect there they are, jay carney to the podium. let s listen in.
2014, there s an election going to take place in syria. i think what we need to do right now immediate cease fire to stop both sides from fighting is the united nations needs to intervene. i think that will be a great step. also, we need to also stop countries like saudi arabia to fund those terrorists who are coming to syria to cause havoc. i think as soon as we have a good cease fire in syria, ta people could pay attention to the 2014 election. and have candidates. i think we need representation from all sectors of the syrian people. thanks so much. out of time. with a different very different viewpoint when she was speaking with john mccain before this other option was on the table. so she was sort of ahead of herself in a way. very passionate. in syria, plans to find and destroy chemical weapons picking up some momentum. many experts are wondering if this is even possible. what would actually need to happen to take control of the
security council because of the vetoes we mentioned earlier. now you ve got the u.s., great britain, fans, wanting there to be consequences if any resolution is not followed through. and russia says that s not going to happen. could we be in the same impotent position when it comes to syria and getting some sort of resolution up? some ways we re in a new situation because it seems like the members of the permanent five have something they all seem to agree on which is that syria should happened over its chemical weapons to international control. that s pretty much what everyone is focused on. what they re torn over, should there be a stick somewhere in any resolution which threatens syria if it doesn t move fast enough in the french first tabled a resolution that threatened serious consequences, then a weakened down version, standard u.n. language for the part of the u.n. charter they re using. the issue is, can john kerry and sergey lavrov tomorrow in geneva bridge big gasp and try