benefits other people, i see that as dubious ethical territory. dubious ethical territory. so what about the argument dubious ethical territory. so what about the argument that - dubious ethical territory. so what about the argument that there i dubious ethical territory. so whatl about the argument that there are significant health consequences in terms of two things, firstly of kids going to school and infects notjust other kids, but potentially teachers and staff, adults, but secondly, the healthiest benefits, mental well being of all the other consequences of yet more time off school. in consequences of yet more time off school. , ., ,., ., , school. in terms of potentially infectin: school. in terms of potentially infecting teachers, school. in terms of potentially infecting teachers, i school. in terms of potentially infecting teachers, i read - school. in terms of potentially infecting teachers, i read the l school. in terms of potentially - infecting teachers, i read the
all he did was turn on the fog machine, and say next question, right, while throwing a few elbows at the new york times. right. if you try to pars it in logical terms his argument would be something like the new york times is fake news so it s okafor me to lie to the new york times. which is obviously ridiculous. let s go through it. there is that, obviously ridiculous. also, as we all know, when the president, or one of the middler of a investigation like this issues any statement, it is to all of us, not to cnn or the new york times you are making a public statement from the office of the presidency or from one of the children of the president. as it happens, the president is involved in of the contracting it. he is making an official statement on behalf of the president of the united states to all americans. even if you took the first argument, obviously he was just trying to get out of the question, it would be if you didn t consider it ridiculous, it would be irr
all he did was object few skate, turn on the fog machine, and say next question, right, while throwing a few elbows at the new york times. right. if you try to pars it in logical terms his argument would be something like the new york times is fake news so it s okafor me to lie to the new york times. which is obviously ridiculous. let s go through it. there is that, obviously ridiculous. also, as we all know, when the president, or one of the president s children in the mill of a investigation like this issues any statement, it is to all of us, not to cnn or the ims. . you are making a public statement from the office of the presidency or from one of the children of the president. as it happens, the president is involved in of the contracting it. he is making an official statement on behalf of the president of the nads to all americans. even if you took the first argument, obviously he was just trying to get out of the question, it would be if you didn t consider it ri