false. nine, the republican threat to cut off cash to ukraine as russia imposes martial law on stolen property. plus, we ll time stock trades by government officials just as covid came to america. the new reporting to go along with our repeated question, whatever happened to that congressional stock trading ban? as the 11th hour gets underway on this wednesday night. good evening once again, i m stephanie ruhle. tonight, the legal pressure is only intensifying for one donald j trump. while he awaits that subpoena from the january 6th committee, a federal judge has issued a new ruling that could be devastating for the ex president. just hours ago, judge david carter revealed that emails showed trump signed legal documents describing election fraud claims that he absolutely knew were false. and yet, he promoted them anyway. those emails were between trump and attorney john eastman, said between november 3rd, 2020, and january 20th, 2021. today, judge carter ordered eastma
past 18 months over the course of the biden presidency so far. that came from the heritage foundation from analysts there that compares it to what is basically taking the titanic into an iceberg. art laffer, the economist that helped turn around this ship under reagan said this in reaction to this report. this inflation number is accelerating. it s not toning down or topping out. brit hume joins us in moments on the political blowback for president biden and what that looks like as we head to the mid-term. first, let s bring in jackie deangelis and mark tepper. thanks for being here. $6,800, jackie, is the bite that s been taken out of people s income if you have mom and dad both working in the home. how does this shape up? first, it was 3,500 and then $5,000 and now it s $6,800. it keeps going on. my biggest problem today even though they re trying to explain it away saying it s backward looking, that doesn t mean it didn t have an impact on people. they re paying more
better back in question as democratic joe manchin deals a crushing blow to newest proposal. fox team coverage. let s start off with aishah live with the latest from the white house, hi, aishah. aishah: good afternoon to you, the president returned late last night to growing frustration among americans and members of his own party on a wide variety of issues. let s start with the build back better agenda now on ice thanks to joe manchin, west virginia senator tanked any hopes for climate or energy funding in august at least blaming rising inflation. progressives are angry over this but manchin is willing to pass a smaller package to lower prescription drug costs and extend healthcare subsidies. the president vowing telling the senate to take manchin s deal and lever climate and energy to him in executive orders. meantime new fox news polling shows biden s approval rating at dismal 30%, 31% approving of job on the economy and 25% on inflation. this as the price of groceries, ho
$15,000 of student loans. bill: i would have loved to have been given 10 grand. it could change your life but i signed a contract. a contract. i had to pay it. that was the bill. dana: i was so afraid i couldn t make my next payment that i made two payments at night. i was a waitress. president biden has had to make this decision over and over because he has hemmed and hawed about it. right now today he is expected to cancel up to $10,000 in student debt for americans making less than $125,000 per year. he will also reportedly extend the pause on loan repayments until after the mid-terms even though apparently we have the best job market in history. bill: taxpayers will foot the bill for all of this. it will cost anywhere between $300 billion at the low end and upwards of $980 billion at the high-end depending the decision he makes. dana: the price tag is raising alarm bells on both sides of the aisle. critics are calling it a hand-out that will do more harm than good
price tag of $300 billion and that that s a low estimate. taxpayers like you and me will fit the bill. here is the president. i believe my plan is responsible and fair. i find it interesting how some of my republican friends who voted for those tax cuts and others think we shouldn t be helping these folks. the outrage over helping working people with student loans is simply wrong to. it s unfair to people who paid the student loads or chose not to take out loans? is it fair to people who do not own multi-million-dollar business is seeing these guys get tax cuts? is that fair? what boat people who struggle to pay their loans and no others don t have to? the costly cancellation of debt sure to unleash a tidal wave of anger from americans who already paid off their loans and those who never went to college in the first place. senator elizabeth warren claims this will help everyone. because of student loan debt there are many people who do not move out of their mom s