Chilled from participating in the enumeration. But that counting is now over and whatever chill ever existed has odd thawed. Appellees therefore pivot to possible future injuries but as of this morning career experts at the Census Bureau confirmed with me that they still dont know even roughly how many illegal aliens they will be able to identify, let alone how their number and geographic concentration may affect apportionment. And if they dont know, certainly the otheparties of the case do not david the court should therefore follow the course charted out by the District Court judge last week, vacate the judgment bel, allow the sectary to comply with the memorandum, and allow any effect on apportionnt to be litigated as it normally would be. Is no merits, there procedural problem with the memorandum. The directionmade in two sets of numbers to decide the numbers being the real fight is sstantive, over how much discretion a president has. Text, history, and president are all clear abou
The District Court held appellees would be injured because illegal aliens will be chilled from participating in the enumeration. But that counting is now over and whatever chill ever existed has odd thawed. Appellees therefore pivot to possible future injuries but as of this morning career experts at the Census Bureau confirmed with me that they still dont know even roughly how many illegal aliens they will be able to identify, let alone how their number and geographic concentration may affect apportionment. And if they dont know, certainly the other parties of the case do not david the court should therefore follow the course charted out by the District Court judge last week, vacate the judgment below, allow the secretary to comply with the memorandum, and allow any effect on apportionment to be litigated as it normally would be. Is no merits, there procedural problem with the memorandum. The directionmade in two sets of numbers to decide the numbers being the real fight is substantiv
Myself in agreement that for many of the best find a way to muddle through. And then to argue in the New York Times on sunday and then someone we just quote what he said meanwhile the scenario with reputable publications where trump induces the legislatures to the clear outcome o with the biden victory. And the granting by the chief executive and black conviction the faith of the american storyma and then to buy of cannot and should not be taken and for granted and those that have been taken place from the greater crisis and uncertainty not to mention the mailin ballots b in that pandemic to the Global Health t19 1818 and the economic recession that has economist scratching their heads of those problems and challenges in the economy polarization and civil unrest and political divisions and from the post office and the president who has already said he will abide by the election. Democracy it seems ironic i have my republican friends senator mike lee saying were not a democracy and that
Roberts court more than any other Supreme Court justice in the recent history john roberts has played a defining role to change our free speech law writing twice as many majority opinions in anyny colleagues b a once philosophicl and tactical 95 percent of those cases decided it is 15 years roberts has been in theaj majority so there is Something Special about this area of cases that speaks to how john roberts sees the court in the First Comprehensive report ron and david each of published looking at those 56 cases handed down by the Roberts Court the authors eyeopening study provides a l detailed look at of the justices differing approaches in here to tell us are the authors and david henson who serves as a legal fellow with individual rights and education with the freedom form is to. Larissa is dean and leading professor of lot university of Missouri School of law where the focus of the research and teaching is tort law and First Amendment with emphasis on freespeech issues and socia
The cross of gold speech. It was from his first run at the white house. We do not come as aggressors. Our war is not a war of conquest. We are fighting in defense of our families and prosperity. We have traditions and our traditions have been scorned. We have entreaties, and our entreaties have been disregarded. We have begged and they have balked when our calamity came. We beg no longer. We entreat no more. We petition no more. We defy them. We go forth confident that we shall win. The words of William Jennings bryan. We are coming to you from his home and office in the state capital of nebraska. It is commonly called fairview, because it gave you a fair view of the land. William Jennings Bryan and his wife moved here in 1902. It is now part of the brian g h Medical Center. We are coming to you from the first floor. His study is just below us. He did much of his writing and entertaining here in this house. We welcome our guest, a professor of history at Georgetown University. He also