iraq. these people are really desperate. the obligation. they are stateless and they re hungry. he this are not stateless. stateless if they towns are bombed out in syria. not first time it has happened. it s been refugee for you believers in international how to handle. this the responsibility falls on the country of first asylum. in this case we are looking at turkey which was providing camp. it s the responsibility of the rest of us to give assistance to turkey through the u.n. high commissioner for refugees. let s go back to the beginning. you are saying refugees once you have refugees. you say look at the root cause. we have let isis it s a fertile breeding ground for isis in syria and iraq. that s right. if isis weren t setting up a caliphate and persecuting those it disagrees with, the refugee problem would be more containable. but let s also be clear. refugee doctrine, since world war ii is that the first preference is
trench didn t work. of losing the whole boardwalk. and so, you know, my view is, we ve got some pieces of the boardwalk to repair. some businesses on the boardwalk to rebuild. but, you know, in the context of what we ve been through already, much smaller. much more containable. and i think much more attainable for us in a relatively shorter period of time. governor chris christie there talking to reporters and business owners. later on we re going to be actually be talking to a business owner on that boardwalk who had a chance to talk to governor christie earlier today to find out what his hopes are for rebuilding after that inferno. turning now to colorado and to unprecedented rescue attempts to reach hundreds of people stranded in record high floodwaters. the hardest-hit area is around boulder. they got a year s worth of rain in just a matter of days. the storms are blamed for at least four deaths and 172 people still unaccounted for ten miles away in longmont, the challenge
so there is nothing nefarious going on. i will say it s a missed opportunity by him at his hearing to just shut it down. he should have and he shouldn t have made light of it. it s actually an important piece of information for people to have. but this is a fabricated debate. just because bill o reilly is raising questions about it doesn t mean that there is actually anything going on here. the nature of congressional investigations is to produce almost an endless series of these factoids. the bright, sharp line is still the same. what takes this from where it is now to something bigger is if there is clear evidence that someone beyond the irs ordered them to have this kind of differential enforcement. until we have that i think you have a challenge that is containable for the administration. i think we ll have, jake, a lot of examples of, you know, information that kind of raises more questions. until you find something that crosses that very clear line, i think this is still a cont
points, the irs digging into the tea party, the fbi digging for reporter s phone records are containable if the president takes two steps. clear himself of mischief and fire anyone in the executive branch that was into the mischief. the real problem is the nature of the second term. there s a strong chance he lacked a hard nosed agenda. there s nothing the president s fighting for, asking us to fight for. there s no cause and without a cause, there is no urgent need to be there for him. i think the best goal for this president is to create jobs. no one will ever target a democrat for trying to do what they believe in doing. it s what made the democratic party great in the 1930s. put men and women to work. create big construction projects that demand work and do it now, mr. president. interest rates will never be this low, ever. money will never be this less
let me finish with this. i said that the president s problems, the benghazi talking points, the irs digging into the tea party, the fbi digging for reporter s phone records are containable if the president takes two steps. clear himself of mischief and fire anyone in the executive branch that was into the mischief. the real problem is the nature of the second term. there s a strong chance he lacked a hard nosed agenda. there s nothing the president s fighting for, asking us to fight for. there s no cause and without a cause, there is no urgent need to be there for him. i think the best goal for this president is to create jobs. no one will ever target a democrat for trying to do what they believe in doing. it s what made the democratic party great in the 1930s. put men and women to work. create big construction projects that demand work and do it now,