secretary mattis and kelly. you see a limited amount of restraint. part of that i am told by my sources, they believe in politics and most of the tweets, it sing a if the president goats in his own direction, on foreign policy, they wants him to take guidance, even today we saw that s not even the case. how can me make proper judgment if he can t have the facts in his head? he s a reactor. he is won sa that consums media information. his social media director. alerting him things that pop up on twitter. he likes to react. this is a core quality of the character. that s a lot of right wingers and left wingers to pass around nonsense that pleases them. it s not an objective effort to secure the truth. throughout his career, chris, we seen when it comes to his finances the state of his business, his celebrity. he has often created his own
along with time saw the public interests and beginning to unseal those documents. nor one thing this is a president who campaigned on a platform of curbing illegal immigration and yet at the same time it was demonstrated by the cross action lawsuit, he was utilizing or contractors he had hired were utilizing undocumented polish labor to build trump tower. we thought that was information certainly in the public interest. i think it s important to note that this is a president who is as you say litigious. the usa today reported during the campaign that he as a party or has been a party over the past three decades, over 4,000 lawsuits. it s not in your to do it. he doesn t pay a bill. he makes somebody pay the bill. he sues them. how do you think won the case in court and get it out now? there is a first amendment,
heidi, here we have, this is the thing i don t know and both of you have as to respond. do the people around him know you can t trust him for facts or assume he is speaking metaphorically or symbolically he knows the facts of what he is saying are not important to him? it sounds like that was the whole purpose in bringing kelly around was to try to wall off some of the competing information that he was getting. so that at least they can try and control who was coming to him with information and make sure that he was surrounded by actual facts. but when he goes into that black hole of the internet and the twitter sphere, he is retweeting things from these conspiracy websites. i think for him to give the tweet by putting it out by himself, he does give it some veracity to people on his side politically. that s a horrible thing, because he is selling stuff he doesn t even believe in, himself. robert, last word. when you look at the president s responses to north korea and any milita
right of access to court records, with i the court ruled that donald trump and the trump organization who opposed our motion to unseal, they hadn t demonstrated a reason to keep this unteal, it would overcome the right of access. i this i the court explicitly recognized the context here, this was a matter of public interest, a lawsuit that involves now the president of the united states, it was important for the public can he get his tax returns for us? try to bring them to the public? anything else? we are working on a number of unsealing matters. we are particularly interested in government under surveillance matter, particularly as they relate to computer source regulations. one of the things we re concerned about and journalists are concerned about is the use of warrantssh subpoenas and other types of electronic applications. suppose bob woodward were working today, shanding in the bakesment with deep throat, getting inside information, how would the attorney general if h
nbc which were ignored. in september, lauer interviewed bill o reilly who had just been fired from fox news over allegations of sexual misconduct. doesn t it seem safe to assume the people at fox news were given a piece of information or given some evidence that simply made it impossible for to you stay on at fox news? that s a false assumption. but you don t let your number one guy go. sure you do. unless you have information that you think makes him there that s not true. for nbc news the star anchor s departure is an enormous loss. lauer has been the face of the network during pivotal news events, influencing the world s most influential people. that s nbc news stephanie govg. for more, i am joined by senior editor claire atkins. thank you for this story. it s what it is or something more here we should know about, the context, who knew about this, whatever? reporter: i think people always ask those questions about who knew what when? i think with these allegation