Samsung s compliance body receives constructive review
Posted : 2020-12-20 16:54
Updated : 2020-12-20 19:14
Samsung Electronics Vice Chairman Lee Jae-yong, center, heads to a court room to attend a re-hearing of his case at the Seoul High Court, Nov. 30. / Yonhap
By Baek Byung-yeul
Samsung s self-created compliance committee received a constructive review from a court advisory panel, being recognized for its effectiveness as a watchdog in ensuring the country s top conglomerate abided by the law and improved group-wide management transparency.
As the group s leader Lee Jae-yong is undergoing a high court re-hearing over a bribery scandal involving jailed former president Park, it remains to be seen whether the group s efforts to be as transparent as possible will affect the ruling.
experience issue, she hasn t been in congress that long and the question would be, does she if she could get the nomination, will she seem to be somebody who can go toe to toe with barack obama and looks like somebody the american people could put in the oval office? well, you know, i was very impressed with michele bachmann when i interviewed her last week for the paper, paul. she s lightning in bottle as we described her in our news story. she is someone who is incredibly dynamic, i was impressed how knowledgeable she was in economic issues. what people paid attention to our the story, she reads ludwig van nesis on the beach. hold on, the austrian economist. do you believe that when she said that. i do believe her. she knew about his writings and she said really i, i love the stuff he rights about consumer sovereignty and she s knowledgeable with economics
are unintended. just adding a layer of complexity which is going to make it hard for anybody to use tylenol go. to a doctor and get an appointment which is really nuts. adding another level of complexity. bret: because the bill needed financing to pay for it or at least show the deficit was not going to be according to the cbo. it had to say it would reduce cost. it does this crazy regulation. i think it s not inunintended. this is the use of regulation to kill health savings accounts which are the one element, the one examp of consumer sovereignty in health care. that s what liberals want to eradicated. they want a government-run system directly or indirectly. health savings account are an affront. what you do is you say to anybody holding it, if you have got arthritis and you want to get aleve, you are going to have to go to a doctor, waste half a day, pay for a visit, which nobody is going to do. it s a way to kill the private
in part, the consequences here are unintended. just adding a layer of complexity which is going to make it hard for anybody to use tylenol go. to a doctor and get an appointment which is really nuts. adding another level of complexity. bret: because the bill needed financing to pay for it or at least show the deficit was not going to be according to the cbo. it had to say it would reduce cost. it does this crazy regulation. i think it s not inunintended. this is the use of regulation to kill health savings accounts which are the one element, the one example of consumer sovereignty in health care. that s what liberals want to eradicated. they want a government-run system directly or indirectly. health savings account are an affront. what you do is you say to anybody holding it, if you have got arthritis and you want to get aleve, you are going to have to go to a doctor, waste half a day, pay for a visit, which nobody is going to do. it s a way to kill the private