And then the north korean government dont tell [inaudible] the second cause, the poor environmental about media industry, as some have already said, too much competition between Media Companies and between people exist. And too little too much space on newspaper and too much time on tv news. So we have to write reports, whatever, everyday, every night. So sometimes well have enough time to verify the facts and check. Its reality. And i think some reporters have the first belief that North Koreans do not argue about their article. And then the last code i have, ideological [inaudible] i want to bring [inaudible] you know, everybody have their own view of north korea. So do the journalists. Some are conservatives and some are [inaudible] so usually the conservatives want to blame north korea, right . And the progressives want to verify. So when conservative journalists meet, conservative also received conservative pundit, or and vice versa. Progressive meet progresses. I think it is like
Well, this is not a medicare ise because a medicare physician, i guess their very limited and cop strained about what constrained about what they can charge, so i guess its more of a question about private insurance. You want to talk that, lou . Yeah. The question reflects, again, the desire to have greater and Greater Transparency in all aspects of health care, including what providers charge. Two things. First, even though theres no national requirement, i know at least in massachusetts if theres anyone here from massachusetts, there is a new law that requires exactly what you suggest, which is the posting of prices. So thatll be an interesting experiment to see what impact that has. There may be other states, im just not aware of it. Well hear from the Consumer Panel after us, i think what Consumers Want to know is our experience has been what Consumers Want to know is not what the provider charges so much as what do i have to pay, which then relates to what is the charge in relatio
Zrebl director of Population Health for Hackensack University health network. 234 that role i initiated and was assisted by the hospital in developing our aco. We were in the first group in 2012 for the mssp program. We looked at it a little bit differently. Our philosophy was we were going to use this as a clinical laboratory. We were jumping in to the valuebased reimbursement scheme and so we decided to limit to primary care physicians to mandate patientcentered medical homes for all of our primary care offices that we bore the cost of all of the training for the primary care for the patientcentered medical homes. We mandated Electronic Medical records and we purchased a relative relatively strong Population Health Electronic Health system which emrs fed data into. This was all up front monies that the hospital, surprisingly enough, was willing to invest in this organization. We started with a little over 12,000 mssp patients with a little over 50 physicians and im happy to say we sa
Hints that in fact there could be a military aspect to this program. The fact that assuage International Concerns about possible military uses of technology that the iranians have been developing ask they have been sending inspection teams in 20 check up on all aspects of the program. China and germany is the plus one. A big group on our side. Their issues have to do with really trying to get a handle on these big visible signs that iran may be heading towards a military program. I talked about enrichment capacity and trying to get the enrichment capacity shrunk way down and looking at the heavy water reactor that they have been using to produce Nuclear Weapons. Lots of questions of those kinds. Its not a negotiation im in charge of, but it has been run by sec ter kerry has wrestled with the negotiation. And there a lot of heavy hitters trying to get progress. The big of heavy lifting is on the political side. Will they take the political decisions to bring the negotiation home. We wil
Them gavel to gavel, but my perception, and i think the perception of many were those very concerns in those cases. But i think whats far more important is to survey the people that were involved in a particular case, the lawyers, the witnesses, i mean, the things that our pilot is going to do. Their perceptions, i think, are much more compelling and persuasive than the perceptions of somebody who is watching it on tv, who doesnt know all the facts, who doesnt know what that witness testified to in a deposition and whether theyre shading their testimony now when theyre in front of television camera. We may not. Viewers may not know that but the parties involved on whose bhaf your speaking, the concerns of the parties involved, certainly we would have these are issues that would have come up time and time again, wouldnt they . As we televise trials all over the country, many of them high profile . All i can tell you, sir, is i think its important to survey people. Im not aware in the st