of trump collusion in this affair. so, on the second count, there s no evidence. now they are going after the post facto stuff, what trump did afterwards, people know they n will not get him on collusion, not on the evidence that we have. the head of the fbi tells him three times you aren t a target and you are in our eyes innocent of this. now it will be on obstruction, y whereas professor alan, dershowitz said, how can theas president be obstructing justice on the flynn case, when he has the constitutionals authority to dismiss the case or to order its dismissal instantly? if he s allowed, i say it s improper, he shouldn t have done it, but the evidence of obstruction of justice when he has the authority to dismiss it completely tucker: it s insane. the one thing that comey s testimony that struck me was there s probably a lot of