Before this was a political issue, that established by the state, establishes use consistently throughout the statute a particular way, when state is defined in the statute, a definition that they didnt mention, states expressly defined in the statute to include d. C. , not include the federal government, territories that are defined as equivalent for certain purposes, federal government never is, when people outside the political context engaged the statute, what was there unpoliticized read of the statute . Federal agencies havent been very forth coming with everything, but, you know, there certainly are efforts to try and look at what did neutral folks, when they read the statute, think it meant, because obviously now everyone who reads the statute has a sense of what the possible implications are. Crs, for example, did an early read where they said basically go by plain text. Pretty strong argument that this is limited. Acknowledge that you could also find it ambiguous. Irs, again,
Networks, friday night starting at 8 00 eastern on cspan, our campaign 2014 debate coverage continues in prime time. On saturday night at 8 00, the funeral for former Washington Post editor ben bradley. Sunday evening at 8 00 on q a, author harold holser on lincoln and the press. Chris tomlinson on the story of two families, one white and one black and the slave plantation that bears their name. Pulitzer prize winning author james mechanic fcpherson on jef davis. And a threehour conversation with mike the porter. One of the first africanamerican labor unions, the brotherhood of sleeping car porters. Saturday night at 8 00 on electric shurs in history, propaganda and americas view of the japanese during world war ii. Sunday afternoon at 4 00 on real america, a 1936 film on tuberculosis in america. Find their Television Schedule at cspan. Org. Let us know what you think about the programs youre watching. Call 2026263400. Email us at comments pennsylvania cspan. Org or send us a tweet csp
But with respect to title vii, of course, its still the case that that employers with 15 or fewer people are not subject to that law, and thats 80 of the employers in the country. And if you run the math, thats its at least 80 thats its going to be somewhere between 10 million and 22 Million People who are not within the coverage. No one would say that because the coverage is incomplete in that respect, that title vii enforcing title vii doesnt advance those were decisions those were decisions that congress made, right . Yes. Well, the grandfathering is not a decision that congress made, is it . Well, the way in which its implemented is a decision that the agency has made, thats true. But even with respect to the Preventive Services, i dont think anyone would say that theres not a compelling interest in advancing Colorectal Cancer screening and immunizations and the things that the Preventive Services provisions provide in addition to contraceptive coverage. I just think this a compell
Well, the grandfathering is not a decision that congress made, is it . Well, the way in which its implemented is a decision that the agency has made, thats true. But even with respect to the Preventive Services, i dont think anyone would say that theres not a compelling interest in advancing Colorectal Cancer screening and immunizations and the things that the Preventive Services provisions provide in addition to contraceptive coverage. I just think this a compelling interest under any understanding of the term. I just want before you get to this point, and my question reflects no point of view at all on my behalf. I just but i took mr. Clement, one of his points, which i thought was an important one. He says there are some people here who strongly object to helping with abortions which include abortifacient contraceptives. Everybody says, yes, they do object to that and thats sincere. So hes not saying this, but i might. But there is a compelling interest in Womens Health and in the h
Under god. Indivisible. With liberty and justice for all. Hey, everybody, its me, kamala. Before i go on stage later tonight, i want to talk about the importance of voting. I know many of you plan to vote this year, but add midst the excitement and enthusiasm for this election, you heard about obstacles and misinformation and folks making it harder for you to cast your ballot. I think we need to ask ourselves, why dont they want us to vote . Why is there so much effort to silence our voices . And the answer is because when we vote, things change. When we vote, things get better. When we vote, we address the need for all people to be treated with dignity and respect in our country. So each of us needs a plan. A voting plan. Joe and i want to make sure youre prepared. If you text vote to 30330, well help you come up with your plan. And remember deadlines and get ready to vote in your community. So send that text and encourage your family and friends to send one too. Now, lets enjoy anoth