election for trump, he cited spifically legal arguments from constitutional law expert lawrence tribe, clainghat tribe had, quote, noted that the only real deadline for a state s electoral votes to be finalized is before congress starts to count the votes on january 6th. lawrence tribe is outfront now. he is the constitutional law expert and harvard law school professor. you get cited specifically. your arguments in his memo to overturn the election. he is your former research assistant at harvard. here he is using your analysis in the memo. what do you say to him? he spelled my name right. that s about it. he took everything and twisted it completely. i ve known this guy, i was going to say kid because he was pretty young when i first met him, for 34 years. he was the research assistant, together with people whose names i think you know, alana kagan, barack obama. but unlike them, he turned to
trump s attempted election interference in georgia. and it is expected to seek numerous charges in the next days. and the special counsel jack smith obtaining a secret memo the trump team used to defend the fake elector scheme. the document citing writings by constitutional law expert lawrence tribe. well, he s outfront to tell us what he thinks about how they used his words. and breaking news, at least six people dead as wildfires rage on maui. some even jumping in the ocean to escape the flames. new video tonight revealing utter devastation. let s go outfront. good evening. i m erin burnett. outfront tonight, more than a dozen individuals could face new indictments, and former president donald trump believes that he will be among those charged. this time in georgia where fulton county district attorney fani willis is expected to seek charges against more than a dozen people when she presents her case before a grand jury next week. now, these are live pictures on your screen
saying two things at once because people like jay, and a lot of people say there is trump being trump. but he was quite crystal clear that the country could never have a president, a candidate running for president was under indictment. that would be a constitutional crisis back then. imagine that he found out that there was someone who had been indicted twice, on state charges and federal charges, and then impeached twice, and that person he would not have liked that choice. he would not of like that. but a lot of the trump stuff was projection. there is this kind of hillary is dangerous for the reason, i mean, he did everything, and remember, part of what is a hallmark of him is that he would also just, you know, lie, and not tell the truth, and anything that would serve his case, he would go along with. professor, your constitutional law expert. what do you think when you hear president trump say that in 2016? i think about the 25th
ways in which the administration gets around just looking at people for being capable. for sure, there is nothing to recommend this legacy application, and the reason that it s done is for donations. they think that they will get a more alumni giving if there s a family legacy. maybe that is true, but it s an advantage to the students. and also, many of the schools, the very elite colleges have millions, billions of dollar endowments. there, finder going to be fine. professor, is so eye-opening to look at this lens. it s a conversation that has happened, i mean, more acutely since the supreme court ruling last week of what is affirmative action, what is an unfair advantage? when you look at it this way, how s legacy not in that category? it s very interesting listening to the conversation of the other panelists. hearing how they can barrasso