discussion about where this country is is headed. not this hit and run stuff, not to cherry pick but a more folsom understanding. william jacob son was a great professor, i think this paragraph sums it up. there is a thin line in society between food and anarchy, freedom and repression. liberty and tyranny, s safety and street violence, it is thinner than we want to admit. tearing down society is a dangerous game. that thin line is be on lbe on rated in europe. and leaving those countries vulnerable to as go cuts off, which putin is implementing. what about the united states? it got me to thinking. in between our elections, a lot happens to this country this is not subject to elections. did you support the hiring of 87 thousand new irs agents. was that on a ballot. or k d disruption of emergency independent and attack on automobiles and other vehicles that use gasoline? did you support somehow somewhere or vote for open borders, where fentanyl and illegal immunities and m
country is headed. not this hit and run stuff, not to cherry pick but a more folsom understanding, william jacob son with a great web site, this pairnk gave sums it up for me: so this garcie paragraph sums it up for me: what about the united states? this got mde to thinking. in between our elections, a lot happens to this country s tothat is not subject to elections. no longer subject to representative government. did you support the hiring of 87 thousand new irs agents? was that on a boot ballot, the disruption of energy independence? and complete attack on theepen c combustion engine and automobiles that usene? gasoline? did yo u support somehow, or vote for open borders where fentanyl and illegall im immunity and ms-13 and drugg car at the time cartels our can operate freely? did you votede forr. or support or hear about a massive debt? a massive debte like the planet has never seen on top of regular spending? that would affect inflation the way it does. did someone r
more than one bill or one policy this the other side plays for keeps, they want to change our constitution system, destroy the supreme court. they want to export controls over various governing decisions, whether climate and so forth. you get this. condon t you. we re fighting for heart and soul of the country our civilization. you have a left that we have a left that wants to destroy the nuclear family. the foundation of the building block of any society, we have to fight for our values, a fight for heart and soul of america, hopefully more of my colleagues will wake up to that. mark: once again senator people want to help you. ronjohnsonforsenate.com. i will need a lot of help if we ll save the u.s. senate seat this seat is crucial t to gaining majority. mark: you are a great patriot, thank you for everything you have done, i pray you will be returning
policy this the other side plays for keeps, they want to change our constitution system, destroy the supreme court. they want to export controls over various governing decisions, whether climate and so forth. you get this. codon t you. we re fighting for heart and soul of the country our civilization. you have a left that we have a left that wants to destroy the nuclear family. the foundation of the building block of any society, we have to fight for our values, a fight for heart and soul of america, hopefully more of my colleagues will wake up to that. mark: once again senator people want to help you. ronjohnsonforsenate.com. i will need a lot of help if we ll save the u.s. senate seat this seat is crucial to gaining majority. mark: you are a great patriot, thank you for everything you have done, i pray you will be returning
today, about the fact she thinks it s one of the strengths of our constitutional system, people who cannot afford to have a defense will have one provided to them, including detainees at guantanamo bay, and how it speaks to our judicial system, seeing it and arguing as a strength. now, senator graham agreed with her. said yes, i agree with you people deserve representation, that is one of the bedrock foundations of our constitution system, but he is not only an attorney, he was an attorney in the military so he is very familiar with the proceedings on many different levels. he got into the heated back and forth with senator durbin about exactly how many people are at gitmo, whether they should be there, what their rights are now and got heated and i m not sure if it was on the clip but he did get up and walk out. he was done with that conversation at that point. sandra: yep, yep, walked out of the room.