next hour to tomorrow s blockbuster trial in delaware. fox news defending itself against extensive evidence it told viewers a story of conspiracy and fraud in the 2020 election it knew wasn t true. on the panel to discuss is brian lanza, who was a member of donald trump s transition team, and the former labour leader kesia dugdale, now director of thejohn smith centre in glasgow. in other trump related news, senior republicans have been in manhattan today to investigate the district attorney alvin bragg s performance on violent crime. that would be the same alvin bragg who two weeks ago indicted donald trump. we will get the thoughts of our panel on that, and maybe we will test them on their maths. rishi sunak announced today he is setting up a review to tackle the anti maths mindset. notjust a uk problem us schools have experienced a recent fall in standards, too. but let s begin in delaware. in his summaryjudgment issued before this trial gets under way tomorrow, the judg
room to argue that the constitution shields and from liability. hat iii shields and from liability. not if the were shields and from liability. not if they were intentionally - shields and from liability. not if they were intentionally lying - shields and from liability. not if they were intentionally lying about what they they were intentionally lying about what they were they were intentionally lying about what they were reporting, - they were intentionally lying about what they were reporting, and - they were intentionally lying about what they were reporting, and i. what they were reporting, and i think what they were reporting, and i think the what they were reporting, and i think the evidence. what they were reporting, and i think the evidence. we - what they were reporting, and i think the evidence. we have i what they were reporting, and i- think the evidence. we have seen some think the evidence. we have seen some of think the evidence. we have seen some of the th
, netter cooperating. anyone with common sense would be reluctant to talk to this committee. it s hard to coax information from a in-transit lawmaker. i cannot recall a case where congress has subpoenaed one of its own men s. the courts could reject a criminal case involving a lawmaker that is because the constitution says congress to discipline its members and the constitution shields lawmakers from many on-the-job prosecutions. penalties told by democrats could backfire later. house speaker nancy pelosi will not dictate how the house handles noncompliant members. i had no intention of interfering with the work of the committee. 70 congressional threats bring hollow. i think shakespeare put it best the sound of the theory signifying that one. it s not rare for congress to flex its muscles even if there based on anabolic political steroids, chad pergram, fox news. the department of transportation is tracking ahead with the new pilot program that