trump should get that s th constitution but not the internal chatter b the prosecutors. speaking of the constitutio we know what trump wants, we know what the house republican want presumably on trump s behalf what the da wants is for thi all to go away and on its face, this seem like a violation of th separation of powers, does i not? i m not a lawyer, but ther seems to be so much good evidence in the da s favor i terms of basically s investigation cannot ensure no continue how do you read it in terms of the court question is are vali legislative purpose, w certainly haven t seen anythin from jordan that explains what that valid legislative purchas is we know there s a connection t federal funds and while they r doesn t need to be much of a valid legislative purpose th courts have been prett differential to congress there needs to be something. we haven t really seen tha something yet. there is procedural hurdle that the district attorney wil have to encounter. sovereign immunity