investigation might be the most open and shut case of the mall and indictments could be coming soon. plus, the republican accusations and the bribery design to take down president biden. the only problem, there s no actual evidence. in vaccine expert dr. peter hotez is being attacked by joe rogan and elon musk for refusing to debate the dangerous anti vaxxer rfk jr.. he joins me live to set the record straight on the science it ll explain why the debate on vaccines could only spread more lies. june 20 donjek him the first year for u.s. president to be right on federal charges. on tuesday miami the ex president pleaded not guilty to 37 counts related to his mishandling of classified documents. in the front row of that courtroom the man who brought those historic charges special counsel jack smith. but do you know who else was there in miami just outside of that courthouse. the team of sheriffs from nearby georgia. you may be asking yourself what kind of business to sheriff
soon. plus, the republican accusations and the bribery design to take down president biden. the only problem, there s no actual evidence. in vaccine expert dr. peter hotez is being attacked by joe rogan and elon musk for refusing to debate the dangerous anti vaxxer rfk jr.. he joins me live to set the record straight on the science it ll explain why the debate on vaccines could only spread more lies. one story has dominated the a team of sheriff from nearby georgia. you may be asking yourself what kind of business to sheriffs from georgia and florida. according to pat lowball they were scooping it out. the boss told local local atlanta-based quote, they are there today just as they were in new york in opportunity for us to learn and make sure we are equally prepared. equally prepared for what? their presence offers a timely reminder that while trump is now faced two indictments a third appears just on the horizon. back in may, fulton county district attorney fani will
after the fight over the 2020 election, what lessons have been learned? someone s going to get hurt, someone s going to get shot, someone s going to get killed. election workers facing death threats. we ve seen a dangerous increase in threats against public servants. in 2024, the bad actors will be more coordinated, more strategic. we support every voter right free and accurate. this morning a by part can conversation with the secretaries of state in four key battleground state. plus, the threat of disinformation, artificial intelligence and the increase of heightened risk from foreign actors. i ll speak with anne applebaum and rene de-res ta. and in a year when we ll hold elections, how will it work? joining us, peter banker, amna nawaz, evelyn far ka, and ben ginsberg. welcome to sunday and a special edition of meet the press. announcer: from nbc news in washington, the longest running show in television history, this is a special edition of meet the
philip, at the center of the burisma conspiracy theory, is then vice president biden publicly threatened ukraine that it would get a billion dollars of loan guarantees until they removed the then prosecuted victor shokin who republicans say it was investigating corruption at burisma. philip, didn t we learned during the first trump impeachment trial back in 20 2019, that show can wasn t even investigate brisbane to begin with. the conspiracy theory doesn t really make sense. also, if andrea bottom, why am i announcing to the world that i m doing corruption? this is our rehash from four years ago. we made it through this. there s no evidence to show it was actually engaged in this investigation. this has been over multiple times. the problem with shokin, the reason they made it it wasn t just by that it was an array of people from the west. all sorts of european leaders were joining that call. it was corrupt. he wasn t investigating corruption. he was going out there and he wasn t
anything other than elevate cranks. you re absolutely right. there are certain things you debate. i understand what a debate about 18th century and lightning philosophy is, debating russo and bishop barkley. i understand political debates. in science, we don t typically do debates. what we do is we write scientific papers. we present our findings in front of a critical audience of pearce to solicitous their input and suggestions. one doesn t typically debate science. maybe the one-off discussion of an evolution versus creationism. that sort of thing that s not what we do in science. so, that s problem number one. problem number two, debating with our cages in, or i ve discussed this issue with him many times by phone and by email. the problem is, he just keeps on moving the goalpost. first it was the what s that? we mean the goalpost is literally white conspiracy