brave young women who have already come forward and to the many others who have yet to do, let me reiterate that we remain committed to standing for you and our investigation of the conduct charged in that indictment which included a conspiracy count. just yesterday, the new york federal court unsealed thousands of pages of court documents alleging new details of sexual abuse claims against epstein and several prominent associates including britain s prince andrew, former senator george mitchell and former new mexico governor bill richardson. none of them have been charged, jon. jon: but to call in the fbi and the inspector general, that suggests that somebody at the department of justice, either thinks there was wrongdoing at the prison, the jail, or that maybe this was a murder? there should be evidence to prove that either way. i mean when he is on suicide watch, there s going to be a detailed meticulous log of his psychological state, and it will point to whether or not there was
defendant worked and conspired with others including employees and associate who s facilitated his conduct by among other things contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with epstein at the new york residence and at the palm beach residence. in the florida case, tom, there was immunity for others involved in this. in this particular case they have mentioned other people involved. they referred to his assistance. what do we know about this? well, it s a really good question. something just came up in the last hearing that we were listening to, ali, that i think may further inform us on this issue. the judge asked federal prosecutors whether or not they thought that they were going to bring forward any more charges against other individuals noting the sex trafficking count. the first count is a conspiracy count. and they interanswered the kind of indirectly but a little bit interesting saying that we don t plan on immediate superseding
call collusion with russia on the part of paul manafort. what we weren t sure about was what was in those redacted lines there. do you think there could be more charges against manafort? against manafort, absolutely. there could be a superseding indictment that comes down the road that charges new crimes not on top of what s already been done in the eastern district and the district of columbia. maybe even a conspiracy count. there are other people that mueller is clearly still looking at. they may not be defendants. they may never be charged. the reason why their names may be redacted, there s more work to possibly be done by the mueller team. i m not so concerned about the redactions. i m more concerned about whether the mueller team is wrapping up. it s reading tea leaves. who knows if he s going to be done now or in a few months. you mentioned pardon in a few months ago. there s a new piece out. are new york democrats handing paul manafort a case for pardon.
a total mess. they have found no collusion and have gone absolutely nuts. they are screaming and shouting at people, horribly threatening them to come up with the answers they want. they are a disgrace to our nation and don t care how many lives the ruin. a total witch hunt like no other in american history! it doesn t matter to him that his claims have no basis. it doesn t matter that his words may degrade faith in our independent law enforcement agencies. the miller investigation got a victory today when it d.c. judge upheld the conspiracy count against russian company accused of meddling in the 2016 election. but the judge warned mueller s team about overreach and the difficulty proving some charges that trial. shannon: catherine herridge, think of he her. the president offering a rebuke of mueller in a twitter storm. time for tonight s power panel. dave brown, mollie hemingway, jason chaffetz. welcome to all of you. i want to read something from fivethirtyeight.com. now tha
that includes a number of different crimes, all of which were charged separately in the original indictment, but now grouped in this conspiracy count. he is admitting to the conducts he was charged with, just with fewer counts and a cap on his sentence. the real question and we are reading tea leaves here and will know in about a half hour or so whether or not he is cooperating, is, you know, whether he is agreeing to cooperate against any number of people, including potentially the president or whether he is trying to limit his sentencing exposure after the trial he had in virginia. there s a lot of good reason, by the way, for paul manafort to try to do that and for the special counsel s office to avoid another trial and avoid having to call gates as a witness. he got battered to save resources, all because, most