pictures of gay couples kissing and embracing under the headline equal dignity. the culmination of decades of activism that set off jubilation and airful embraces tearful embraces. many a times follow-up, there was revelry is and soul searching on gay pride day. such cities as new york city and san francisco promised a sort of social catharsis of bicoastal toast to the nation s rapid shift on gay rights and an extended curtain call for the movement that drove it. now, the washington post front page story said the decision rewarded years of legal work by same-sex marriage advocates and pointed to the vexing challenge now facing republican presidential candidates and the gop itself, how to get in step with modern america. we also looked at the coverage of the original 1973 roe v. wade decision, and while it was overshadowed by the death of lbj, it reflects that newspapers mainly took a just the facts approach. the washington post quoted the majority, then the minority
january 6th. an omnipresent person there. he was involved or present during many of the moments that cassidy hutchison described in her testimony, including this moment. i saw mr. cipollone right before i walked out that morning, and he said something to the effect of, please make sure we don t go up to the capitol, cassidy. keep in touch with me. we re going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen. manu raju is outfront live on capitol hill. you heard her recount her conversation with pat cipollone. so this subpoena, obviously significant. what are you learning about it? reporter: this subpoena sent today, demanding that he appear before this committee, saying that they have spoken to him in an informal basis, acknowledging that it did happen on april 13th, but now wanting his testimony, especially in light of all the new information that s come out. one of the big things that has come out through the course of these hearings and th
an indication that there s worry about what that impact could be, and they have to push back. and some of the pushback is fair and some of pushback, i think, is a little bit hard to believe, the idea that that she s just a nobody that had no role. i mean, she was working inside west wing right outside chief of staff s office. howard: but there is a divide on the right, as you know. the conservative washington examiner saying that donald trump is unfit for office. andy mccarthy calling the testimony devastate thing. and mick mulvaney, who s trump s guy, acting chief of staff before mark meadows, making the rounds saying he knows hutchinson, he believes her, and he doesn t think donald trump should be nominee. what explains this split? and he s not the only one. there are other alumni out on social media defending hutchinson and her credibility and her character. of so clearly so, clearly, there s a big with battle over this particular testimony of
conservative washington examiner. outfront now, republican governor of arkansas, asa hutchison. governor, i appreciate your time. you hear that context, and the january 6th moments ago subpoenaed the former trump white house council pat cipollone. he was present throughout all of this, he was with the president throughout all of this. he was depicted in cassidy hutchison s testimony as a warning that trump would face criminal liability and saying blood on your hands to anyone who as this day continued. how important is it to hear from pat cipollone, governor? well, he s a key person in all of the discussions, and cassidy hutchison yesterday certainly indicated that he was right in the middle of it. he understood what was going on. he cast warnings as to what
well, i m not worried about it happening. if those individuals raise the issues, we have a process by which we go through. none of the information that we have gleaned thus far indicate that black lives matter or antifa was involved in the activities of january 6th. if those individuals have information, they need to present it. but otherwise, we ll proceed where the investigation leads us. let me ask you this, too. because byron york of the conservative washington examiner has laid out what i think will be th the republican argument against the committee. it will be about one, getting trump, two, getting mccarthy, and three, getting any other republican who might be gettable. how do you respond to byron york? i suggest he read the resolution establishing the select committee. the scope of the committee is quite clear as to what our