exactly. very quickly, jordan, what would you have happen to this law as you try to get to the supreme court? we re trying to protect the conscience rights, engrand rights in our constitution. we ll get an opinion likely in june. there are other challenges to the provisions of the law. the law clearly said you wouldn t get any of the subsidies, thus you wouldn t be penalized. does the letter of the law stand? d.c. federal judge who will at least hear the argument come february. legal challenges are coming ahead. you had dr. ben carson on, a good friend of ours. i would like to have ben carson write the medical plan, health care plan for america and from the poor to the rich i think we would all be much better off. jordan sekulow, dr. nina radcliff, thank you. thank you, judge. the one and only ben stin is here to tell us why republicans
exactly. very quickly, jordan, what would you have happen to this law as you try to get to the supreme court? we re trying to protect the conscience rights, engrand rights in our constitution. we ll get an opinion likely in june. there are other challenges to the provisions of the law. the law clearly said you wouldn t g any of the subsidies, thus you wouldn t be penalized. does the letter of the law stand? d.c. federal judge who will at least hear the argument come february. legal challenges are coming ahead. you had dr. ben carson on, a good friend of ours. i would like to have ben carson write the medical plan, health care plan for america and from the poor to the rich i think we would all be much better off. jordan sekulow, dr. nina radcliff, thank you. thank you, judge. the one and only ben stin is here to tell us why republicans
are not discriminating against an individual for who they are. so how do you thread that needle though? that s how you do it. you re not allowed discrimination based upon the color of someone s skin or because they happen to have a particular sexual orientation. but you can say i don t want to participate in activities that i have a religious objection to. i think that s the differentiate. and the problem is we sort of blurred this line. and now we re saying look anybody who objects to anything in this area is somehow discriminatory or bigoted and that s simply not the case. and laws should be in place to protect people s conscience rights. ted cruz has been very critical of his fellow republicans basically ripping them for caving in and even changing the law. do you think the law was okay in its original form? or do you think that both mike pence and asa hutchinson were right? asa just signed the bill today. i think the change they made was simply to conform it to the federal