nuclear war. that s been a problem, in my mind, a with all presidents and of course a problem with this president. and is there any method that you can conceive of that would somehow remove that power from the presidency as we have discussed on this program in past. sometimes with the possibility of incoming nuclear attack. a president would have six minutes or less to decide to retaliate. in that kind of scenario, is there any alternative to just entrusting all of this power in one person? with the constitution of course faces responsibility for making war with the cons gres. the president can propose the congress has to approve of it. on the other hand, you can say, in the case after nuclear war and veents may happen to fast. ere is no timeor congress. what we can do is require at the president not launch a nuclear war absent an actual nuclear detonation in our
factor after president of the out who made the kinds of comments about nuclear weapons that incoming president trump has? i must say, i am concerned with the fact that one man, president of the united states, whoever that president is, is the only person that can start a nuclear war. that one person can start a nuclear war. that s been a problem, in my mind, a with all presidents and of course a problem with this president. and is there any method that you can conceive of that would somehow remove that power from the presidency as we have discussed on this program in past. sometimes with the possibility of incoming nuclear attack. a president would have six minutes or less to decide to retaliate. in that kind of scenario, is there any alternative to just entrusting all of this power in one person? with the constitution of course faces responsibility for making war with the cons gres.