To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On October 2, 2020, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion vacating a district court’s judgment as a matter of law and reinstating a jury verdict finding of induced infringement of a patented use that had been carved out of a generic applicant’s label.
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 976 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2020). We previously analyzed this opinion and its impact in
At issue in the case is whether Teva’s marketing of carvedilol first with a skinny label, and later an amended label including the carved out indication as required by FDA, induced infringement of GSK’s reissue patent, RE40,000 (“the ’000 patent”).
this is astonishing to read white house aides already sort of talking amongst themselves about the prospect of being under constant investigation. you covered the white house in which i worked where that was our reality. congressman waxman who subpoenaed records on enron, the energy task force. that s a new reality that would be a new reality for this white house and the talk about impeachment. talk about that. i think that s exactly right. i think you hear the president in public musing about the possibility of impeachment. he said in montana the other day that might be possible. he told supporters in the crowd, if i get impeached, it s your fault because it means you didn t go vote. he said if i m impeached it was on you. it s on you. exactly. he s already, i think, sort of bracing for this idea that if democrats win, that does put him in very serious jeopardy, first of all, for multiple investigations and second of all for some sort of impeachment inquiry. it s hard to imagine
eddie glaude, i worked in a white house when congressman waxman had this power. i turned over my e-mails, once around the enron scandal, once around the energy task force, once around valerie plame. that was waxman s committee. it is life changing for the most button down white house with norms and procedures and controls. it seems like it could be the true unraveling of the trump circus. especially combined with what s happening in the courts already. correct. right? and so these people already have lawyers. that s a great point. they already have lawyers. but what s interesting here is that what they ve just laid out is, is congress doing its job? the democrats. not just the democrats, the body, the institution doing its job. we ve been many of us have been longing for congress to exercise its power, right? and so in this instance we have although they may be scared about the politics and what it might mean for the white house and how it might function,
covered in this country? i don t know. it would be by the choice of the american people. they ll have low-cost coverage options. 20 million people covered under the current law. about half those are medicaid. we re not taking that away. people are going to continue to be covered. but you are changing how the medicaid money is given to the states and there are senators that have taken that medicaid funding that are very concerned about how it s done. i d encourage you to look at what president clinton and congressman waxman said back in the 90s about these per capita caps. they are the ones that came up with the idea and it s a conservative approach. so this is nothing new. this has been around washington, d.c., for a long time. states are clamoring for choice. they are clamoring for opportunity to do things like healthy indiana plan which we did in our state which gives the state the flexibility to cover its citizens. we covered about 300,000 people. so i would argue this is not
know, of the blue. this has been around washington for a long time, including from what former congressman waxman said and president clinton in the 90ss. states are clamoring for choice, clamoring for flexibility, and we intend to provide that for them. and i think that states are likely to cover probably more people if they choose to do so. and i would encourage everyone to look at healthy indiana plan and what we ve done there. you keep using the words choice and people will more people or as many will be covered if they choose to buy. do you think any american would actually choose not to buy health care for their family if the if they truly could afford it and no problem at all, that they are just going to make that choice? a lot of american families, isn t that an impossible choice to make? remember, 26 to 28 million people are currently not covered under the affordable care act and last year, about 19 million people either paid the penalty or got an exemption from