because they have a whole bunch of people they believe are above the law. tom fitton, thank you. thank you. the entire framing of robert mueller s investigation exposes how corrupt it was from day one, american innocence is supposed to be assumed, not guilt. but to democrats in the congress, americans are not quote fully exonerated and therefore guilty. congressman james sensenbrenner blasted them for this. watch this. there are a couple statements you made, you said this is not for me to decide and the implication is this is for this committee to decide. now you did word the word impeachable conduct like star did. there was no statute to prevent you from using the word impeachable conduct. and i go back to what mr. rad cliff said, and that is, is that even the president is innocent until proven guilty. my time is up. tucker: well, that s it right there. congressman sensenbrenner joins
congress today refusing to answer a question from congressman sensenbrenner about if there is anything in the second volume of the report that said president trump maven gauged in impeachable conduct and as the call for impeachment proceedings grows to at least 92. manu raju is live on capitol hill and what are you hearing from lawmakers about the push for impeachment today, 92 is few more than we started the day with. i think it was 88. but still a minority of the democratic caucus. reporter: and democrats do expect that number to grow. even if robert mueller may not have delivered the command performance that some democrats may have wanted, they said ultimately their objective was fulfilled. i talked to a number of democrats on the house judiciary committee and intelligence committee particularly ones supporting calls for impeachment and they believe the case is bolstered and more support will grow from this regard and one member who had not publicly announced support for an impeac
he s got so that he s not appearing to influence an election, which was the standard investigative and prosecutorial m.o. i want to start out by agreeing with my friend, the governor, i had no problem with fast-tracking this thing. i think it would be very important. i do want to say though that the fbi has been known to pull some october surprises. i don t know exactly the sequence with ted stephens, senator from alaska. he was exonerated, and died in the meantime. congressman kirk weldon from pennsylvania a number of years ago had his office raided by the fbi on the eve of the election. so they have been known to do this sort of thing. but i agree with the governor, let s put all the facts out there. but i want to say this, very important when, he was testifying in front of congress, congressman jim sensenbrenner pointed out there were some other stuff that apparently the fbi had not investigated, that
had come to light, come to public attention, and did the did the director feel like that merited further investigation? director comey answered congressman sensenbrenner and said nothing had risen to that level but if something does rise to that level i will certainly let you know. having said that i think this is very important stuff. okay. congressman we don t know what it s risen to. that s the kicker. we don t know what it is, that s her point. what if what it is is not damaging to hillary clinton? do you still want it out there as a trump supporter? do you know what? the short answer you don t think that the question mark as mark preston said in the last segment, the question mark is much better for donald trump than maybe even knowing what s in there. i think if he puts the information out there, i i m comfortable with it because what congressman sensenbrenner was talking about is the fact that there were there was more than one server, 13 different device
dismantled with that 1965 voting rights act. i m hopeful that when we leave that bridge on sunday and go back to washington in a week that all the 98 congress people who are there will all sign on to mr. sensenbrenner s amendments so that we can restore what the roberts court has done to that 1965 voting rights act. what do you make of these republicans pushing they voter i.d. requirements and even in pennsylvania, the leadership which dominates the legislature saying we re openly doing this to say we re doing it to keep votes.