and saying his presumptions, they kept out the word presumption when they went to the microphone at the break which they planned that break earlier by the way. he kept talking about this. well, it s a quid pro quo because he presumed it. if the cups and, well, two plus two equals four and i brought out to presumptions, plus two presumptions doesn t even add out to one fact. of the fact is, yet the conversation with the president and he said i want nothing, nope, no quid pro quo, if you saw it, mr. sondland that this was a quid pro quo, what in the world to do not message to mentioned to the president at the time. sean: going back to congressman meadow, we ve a compromise chairman s, we ve chairman and for three years how does he do it again? he gets everyone to follow him over the cliff again with the conspiracy theories and lies. well, he s being aided and abetted by mainstream media, and it s interesting, here s the
comey said behind closed doors and in the report. how frustrating we don t know what congressman meadows knows what jim comey said under oath behind closed doortsz. so the allegation is he said some things under oath in secret. and then he said some things under oath in private. and they are inconsistent. they couldn t both be true and they were both under oath. they must have lied somewhere. that s congressman meadow s allegation. what he has done with it is the proper thing to do. said to the inspector general. can you resolve this? can you decide where the truth is? and if you think one of these is a lie, would you refer it to the u.s. attorney in connecticut? why connecticut? he is the person that s been assigned by the justice department to investigate and seek indictment. brian: sure. the inspector general, the fellow who was just on the screen, mike horowitz, dolls not seek indictments. he does not prosecute. he investigates present and former employees of the dorge, which i
must have really happened when just the opposite is true. the only russian interference came from hillary paying for russian lies disseminated to the american people and used as a fraud on a fisa want four times. yeah. listen, a lot of harry houdini going on in may of 2017 at the justice department. they didn t have a case, and instead they tried to create the aura in the public media there was a case. it was obstructed by the president. and i think when we look back in the history we ll see a lot. i was thinking because of the work of congressman meadow, congressman jordan, digging, glen simpson and christopher steele were out peddling their story to the media trying to get it out before the election two years ago. showing political covers. two years later, glen sim sonl can t come and testify to congress because he has to invoke hills right against self inincrimination. how far has this investigation turned. collusion a russia, to collusion with the democratic party and the fbi. it
to create this atmosphere, there is so much happening, when just the opposite is true. the only russian interferencent came from hillary paying for russian lies disseminated to the american people andhe used as a fraudni honest fisa warrant cout four times. yeah. listen, a lot of harry houdini d going on in may of 2017 at the justice department. they didn t have a case, and instead they tried to create the aura in the publicub media there was a case. it was obstructed by the president. and i think when we look back in the history we ll see a lot. i was thinking because of the work of congressman meadow, congressman jordan, digging, two years ago this month, glenn simpson and christopher steele were out peddling their story to the media trying to get it out before the election two years ago. showing political covers. two years later, glen simpson can t come and testify to congress because he has to invoke his right against self oincrimination. how far has this investigation turned fro
do to do our constitutional duty. senior officials met with republicans from the house oversight and judiciary committees for two hours earlier today. after the meeting, congressman meadow says there was agreement that fbi agent peter strzok avoided too many questions during his public testimony earlier this month. and that strzok can t answer this line of questioning from cosman jim jordan about the opposition research firm behind the dossier, fusion gps, and its cofounder glenn simpson. this is the frustration every single member of the committee feels. agent strzok one answer fundamental questions like the guy he references in an email, won t tell me who they are. this is unbelievable. sir, it s as frustrating o me as it is to you. the closed-door depositions from strzok and fbi lawyer lisa page identified records previously unknown to lawmakers. about at least one filed document to the fbi s efforts to verify the trump dossier. those records will not be