Good evening and welcome to ayman, i am serena maxwell, in for ayman. coming up this hour, saved a day, the january six committee is finally scheduling their first public hearing. we have all the details. plus, then marjorie taylor greene lie on the witness stand,
Preventing this from happening again. the model, for this, i think, is the 9/11 commission. there is a series of hearings figuring out what happened in, and then acting a number of lost, designed to help prevent it from happening again. so, like the act, it is for the president to call up of military. you going to aid himself, and is going to be things like the electoral count act, that can be looked at. it is having to be accepted as donald trump s request to decertify the election that day. so, that needs to be shoring up. i think one of the task, before congress, is that after they ve collected this information, and they make recommendations to change as we need in the law, to ensure this never happens again. roberta mcquade, stick around, i want to ask you about marjorie taylor greene, and whether she may have lied under oath, last week, at a hearing
Then this text messages could be part of that plan. they discuss the marshall law as one way of disrupting that vote count. i think it could be bible later. it is certainly something they want to look at. it is why i think this committee is so determined to get their hands on marks meadows text messages. he was clearly texting many people that they. i think that is the secret to unraveling the plot. lawyers for the voters are trying to block marjorie taylor greene for running for reelection. they want this text message submitted as evidence in the case for which he was testifying in. if it is accepted, do you think it will hurt her case, this current case, to seek reelection? well, there is a few pieces of evidence in that attack there. number one, her voters, her constituents, it may be that these are people that elected her to office in the first place. perhaps, they did not find it as objectionable as perhaps that you and i do. this idea of keeping her off
Possibly get him what he wanted in another way. i think the indifference to the attack, either shows this was part of the plan the whole time, or, this sure is a convenient opportunity to take advantage of the situation. what are the things that really struck me, in these text messages, are the dates. so, you have sitting members of congress, actively engaging in conversations with the chief of staff, mark meadows, about ways to keep donald trump in power, after american voters decided, they didn t want that. and, also, after violence has taken place, on january 6th. marjorie taylor greene, her text was on january 17th. how should we process this, given the fact that it is so unprecedented? that is so interesting. if you look at the indictments filed by the justice department, against this plot, they see it didn t end on january six, is just one episode. the plot is going down on
It does prevent her from tying the ventilator. that actually is a joke, barbara, because she spelled it the way that you spelled the joke, marshals. that was a joke, right, that was a joke. we are talking about martial law, and a rti al, and she spelled it marshal like this or you can make this up. it is quite unbelievable, but it is real life, we are living through it. if not relevant specifically to a perjury case, could this text message come up in another case? we were talking earlier about the conspiracy case by the doj. how else could this text messages be relevant? i do think it could be as part of this larger plot of conspiracy to defraud the united states. agreeing with others to try to prevent a legitimate function of government is a crime. to the extent that marjorie taylor greene and mark meadows and donald trump and others were working on a plan to try to prevent that from happening,