and that certainly was the impression i came away with. let me reference who is the fbi attorney who had oversight on the memo, vetted it and said that s an accurate statement. it may not be word for word but it was inaccurate statement. eric: what about potential release of a democratic memo, a rebuttal memo if you will. do you also support their beliefs? sure i do. let me take you through the process they are. adam schiff is arguing we need to have our memo vetted and know that we haven t met that in before returning to dover to the public and took the boat. the first rover took said we let them release their stuart collects, which is what our memo did at first as well. he was arguing it be vetted, but then came back with the motion said he wanted this to be released at the same time as ours immediately. i figure it hasn t i figure it hasn t been vetted so he voted against that. if they come back with a memo that has been vetted and
we just out like this was so important. it s kind of separate from the russia investigation. it is so important that we advise the american people of that. that s why we wanted to release this memo, that this information out as quickly as possible. we will continue the investigation on both sides. this was a bit of a pause to say this is meaningful information the american people deserve to know. reporter: you buy that congressman stalwell? no, i don t. i ve seen all of the evidence. i have been for every second that the witness has testified there was my republican colleagues would do the same. transcripts have been released and mr. stewart wasn t present or didn t ask a question. chris: let s get to the