that statement. there certainly were comments by the president about, you re going to learn something on monday about hillary clinton. we re going to share something you ll find very interesting. that speech that he teed up, which was going to take place after the trump tower meeting, he never gave. now, was that because the trump tower meeting didn t produce what he had hoped it would produce? we don t know. but certainly if mr. nunberg has light to shed on what the president knew before that trump tower meeting, we d be interested in finding out. reporter: now, mike conaway did not really have nearly as much interest as adam schiff, suggesting that perhaps they don t need to go any further about that trump tower meeting. so we know everything we need to know about that meeting going forward. it shows you, anderson, the two sides going in opposite directions at a key point in this investigation as it looks like it s about to wrap up pretty soon, anderson. thanks. joining us by pho
call 1-800-501-6000. we ve got two pieces of babying news in the wake. one, the house intelligence committee s top democrat wants him to appear before the committee. and, two, republicans signal the committee s investigation could wrap up soon. reporting on both for us tonight is cnn s manu raju who joins us from capitol hill. the top republican is signaling committee investigation could be wrapping up. what have you learned about that? reporter: mike conaway had a back and forth with me and other
director, crihristopher wray, deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. i assume it has to do with with your investigation, with who, who will what files they may send over. what folks may come over. did you have that meeting alone with those two, or were either congressman conaway or nunes with you? chuck, this is an example, a question a lot longer than the answer. i really can t comment on that. the only thing i want to say generally on the issue, of the majority s attack on the fbi and the department of justice, this is, i think a profound distraction from what russia did from the issues that we re charged with investigating. it s quite by design and i think it is frankly very much in combination with the referral of christopher steele in a criminal investigation, and will do potentially long-term damage to these institutions. can you simply say if after
against russian intervention are among the top three steps we can take. the house intelligence committee early on, used sometimes as a punching bag by the snay senate saying they re not getting along, partisan. and now it s found its way into the senate. obviously, you re in a dispute. are you dealing with congressman conaway or congressman nunes? my interactions are with mr. conaway and we have a good, working relationship and it has been in many respects a model of bipartisanship but the ultimate decisions are made by chairman nunes. for that reason, subpoenas that should go out aren t and those not necessary carrying us in a completely different direction are going out. end of the day, the leadership of the committee in the
republicans the investigation to come to a hasty close. we did eight interviews, and two interviews not in the city of washington, and that makes it hard for people to get to those interviews, and these require a lot of preparation and work, and so it sure feels like, you know, somebody decided the clock was particularing and they needed to jam who is that person? hard to say. hard to say. as i said all along, i think congressman c congressman conaway is doing a nice job, and they have been tainted by what seems to be a command from the white house to end this thing, which is what we know the president wants. thank you so much for being here. homeowners are rushing to prepay their property taxes before the new tax law takes affect, but will it pay off or