Disregard house rules. For what purposes . Just completelyusrules on not i wanted to confirm point addressing the Minority Hearing today. If i hear t that one more time, of order is the rules of ill address that when were decorum. I dont believe the gentleman marking up impeachment articles. What is the use of a minority from florida meant to violate him andnt i want to give him to hearing day if youre going have benefit of o doubt. To hear evidence of the markup than once he referred if you get the confirmation of to a new york lawyer. If hek is prepared to explain what he meant, i will withdraw the master bedroomrkup yourself. My Point Of Order. Even the most heated development does not know show any way that that is not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, Point Of Order can be theyre. If you destroy the institutional regarding the schedule. There is no Point Of Order integrity, which again, the staff have talked about today, regarding the schedule. Well, onf this case there
it is unprecedented. the page than to conclude that. the lawyering there for the and in fact pursuant to president trump s order, 12 rest of the country is to show executive branch officials refuse toec testify as part of e one type of answer or nonanswer house impeachment inquiry. and compare it to another. ten of whome defied congressiol the public will decide what they make of that. subpoenas. another contentious part of this am i right? bp yes. given the president s hearing came when republicans sweeping directive not to hit on something that is more cooperate with congress, did the potentially legitimate than all investigative committees believe that there was any chance that the ukraine conspiracy theories, other administration officials and this is doug collins pushing would come forward if subpoenaed? the democratic counsel daniel no, it became clear that the goldman about a revelation that president wasle trying to block seemed both important but also potentially cont